Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Champion Graveyard Sound

Posted by Tim - 20/08/10 at 12:08 am

Macro photography and fractals have a lot in common.  I don’t know what that is, but I just sense that they have a “family resemblance”.  Imagine you’re trying to put together a jig-saw puzzle but someone has accidentally thrown in another puzzle with it.  While looking for the pieces that match up with the ones you’ve already put together you’re also picking out the ones that belong to that other puzzle that don’t belong in the same box.  But you also keep coming across pieces that, while they don’t fit in immediately with the small part you’re already assembled, you sense they’re part of the larger complete picture and you want to hold on to them and not put them aside with the pieces of the other puzzle because they look, in some vague and hard to describe way, similar.

Calliphora vomitoria Portrait by Noodle Snacks

Haven’t we all zoomed into something like this in a fractal program?  This fly’s head reminds me of many of the formulas in Sterlingware.  Flies are purely a nuisance when seen at a regular scale but they are both magnificent and terrifying when seen up close.

Housefly on a leaf by Muhammad Mahdi Karim

I got these two fly photos off the Wikipedia.  This second one here is really a work of art.  I like color and I think color almost has a subliminal thought-inducing language and quality all its own.  What an incredible machine the common housefly is; no spaceship or aircraft a human could design will ever look as superb as this housefly.

Haze of Time by jesse

10 Million Year-Old Fractal Found in Antarctic Ice! According to a recent article in the Scientific American, some ancient species of molds when allowed to grow slowly and undisturbed for millions of years, grow and develop in patterns that are identical to those formed by iterating fractal formulas with a computer.

I just made that up, but that’s what I thought when I saw this image by Jesse in the Fractalforums.com gallery.  Great images just make me want to say great things.  The facts come later.

Assimilation by lenord

The mandelbrot inside the mandelbox!  But it seems only natural to find a mandelbrot man inside a mandelbox 3D fractal formula.  He lives there.  Just like a pearl inside an oyster and it’s shell.

I’ve looked at this image quite a bit and I can’t decide if it looks more like the mandelbrot is being absorbed by the mandelbox, as I think the title by lenord is suggesting, or if the mandelbox is actually growing out from –and growing off of–  the mandelbrot just like a plant grows out of a seed.  Lenord’s got some other ones like this and they have the same interesting combination of old and new fractal designs.  Apparently it’s all from the same formula and not from layering or some sly photoshop trick.

Kractal by tatty

New people are always popping up over at Fractalforums.  Fractalforums seems to be where all the action is lately.  I don’t know who any of these people are (and they don’t know me) but I don’t really need to know them when I can just look at their work and judge it for itself.  Tatty has really come up with something new here.  So much detail and such variety of it.  But it doesn’t look like a mandelbox or mandelbulb to me and yet it has that 3D look to it.  Could there really be some new thing called a “Kractal”?

Box 1 by tatty

Another by Tatty.  Already she’s developing some noticeable style just in these two images.  There’s a wide variety of shapes and yet they complement each other instead of clashing or looking pushed together.  Subtle and with good coloring too.

Box 1? If this is just the first she’s off to a great start.  Tatty has a good eye for the sort of pleasing organic shapes that fractals excel at.

The Last Dive by janetino

I followed a link from Mandelwerk’s Deviant Art page to these incredible mandelbox images by Janetino.  Janetino has such unique color palettes.  I’ve never seen any mandelbox images with this sort of coloring that looked so good.  Nice use of the foggy perspective effect here too.

The Laughing Cliff by janetino

This one is really something.  So ornate and such unique color.  The blue haze suggests sky and sunlight streaming into this ornate temple or ritzy spaceship.  I’ve got to look around Deviant Art more.  It’ll be worth it if I find another artist with such unique and well done work as Janetino.  She’s up there with the other top “Mandelboxers” in my opinion.

Hirgrnd1 by Seizo Yamada

Here’s an interesting photo for two reasons:  First, because it has such a dreamy, visionary, summer night, sky full of imagination and wonder look to it.  Second because it’s actually a photograph of the Hiroshima atomic bomb explosion taken, not from the air, but from the ground several miles away by a civilian who just happened to be in the right place at the right time.  It dulls the golden glow of the photo’s dreaminess to know we’re also observing an event that killed over 100,000 people in less time than it takes to answer a ringing telephone.  I wonder how many other attractive things in our world would look less appealing if we knew what we were really looking at?

Texture by hermann

Texture was found on the Fractalforums.com gallery like many of the images here.  The gallery contains (I believe) any images uploaded to the forum for any purpose, either artistic or as examples and illustrations in technical discussions.  I can’t always tell what context the image appears in with respect to the forum postings, I just browse the image gallery in behind the scenes mode and comment on whatever catches my eye.  I like this one for it’s simple, classical fractal style.  Sometimes less is more and this is a good example.  This image has a real sense of style and stands out because of it.

Another World by Well En Taoed

Just like Texture this image features imagery that isn’t new and cutting-edge like the mandelbox or mandelbulb and yet has real style and focuses on the more classical fractal type of imagery.  I think this has an extra layer, a grid pattern over it and although that might seem rather simple the effect it has on the image is strong.  It looks like it could have been taken off a vintage pulp sci-fi cover and maybe the author thought the same thing when he named it.

Mandelbox Lobby by Buddhi

This image really has to be seen in full-size which you can do by clicking on it.  The mandelbox, like most fractals, is capable of producing a lot of imagery but it takes a good eye and some careful experimentation to produce something of interest amidst the deluge of images that pour out of the formula  This one has a surreal look to it.  Maybe it’s the ornate architectural appearance that makes the square “front desk” of the mandelbox lobby look real and therefore strangely out of place.  The fact that it’s sunk below the horizon and hidden from sight enhances the eerie feel.

Menger Borg Mother ship by Cyclops

I hear this Borg thing mentioned here and there but I don’t know what it’s about or what it’s from.  I find it odd that a Cyclops would be making 3D art, but maybe that’s just a screen name for L. Shone?  There’s an MC Escher look to this and I like the careful, repetitive metallic detail in it.  The hole in the center is a nice touch and shows us that the inside is remarkably no different than the outside.  It’s got an old, engraved illustration appearance that I like.

Ave by Agurkyz (AGUS)

Another one that I’d call “classical”.  I guess I’m referring to fractal imagery that is single layer and was much more common back before multi-layered programs like Ultra Fractal came out.  But… this one was apparently made with UF!  I’ve always liked the shiny tubes and other orbit trap kinds of imagery that have an almost collage look to them.   The abrupt transitions resemble cut paper but sometimes the tube forests stretch all the way to the horizon although they do look like the scissors lopped off their upper branches, swift and invisible.  There can be a lot to see in these apparently simple images.  Good art is like that.

Orion4 by Dominique Peronino

I check in on the Fractalforum.com gallery everyday.  When I saw the first of these Orion images I frowned a little because it reminded me of when I first started out making fractal images in Sterlingware almost a decade ago.  Later on, after seeing this one and especially the jagged, machine made elements surrounding it, I began to see the subtle but attractive style that these Orion images have.  This is pure digital vision; it’s all machine made and it shines with a technological glow like only some bold new discovery in a laboratory can.  The machine drew this and no human hand can imitate that cold, fractonic style.

Titan (moon of Saturn) from UltimateUniverse.net

One last one.  This is a real photograph of Titan, the largest of Saturn’s moons.  I think it’s made up of several shots taken by more than one pass of the space probe although it lacks the jumbled, collage look of a composite photo.  I’ve been using this image as my desktop wallpaper for almost a week, centered with a black background.  I keep thinking it’s the opening shot from some vintage, 1950s sci-fi film that’s about to begin:  Sinister Planet.

Anyhow, those are the pieces of the puzzle.  Maybe some of them don’t belong to the same big picture.  Or maybe this puzzle is a lot bigger than the 10,000 piece label on the box says.  We should have started building this on the floor instead of the table.

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

Be Very Very Quiet

Posted by cruelanimal - 11/08/10 at 01:08 pm

My blogging slows down in the summer when other projects get moved to the front burner. But I’m still lurking around.

The 2009 Benoit Mandelbrot Fractal Art Contest exhibition begins in a little over a week in Hyderabad, India, at the 2010 International Congress of Mathematicians, although (so far) publicity for the event has been zilch.  On the main BMFAC site, there has been no information whatsoever about the exhibition at the ICM — or, for that matter, the two earlier shows in Spain.  The main ICM page also says nothing about the exhibition — even if one searches the site for terms like "fractal" and "Mandelbrot."

I hope the main BMFAC site will eventually put up some documentation about the 2009 show.  After all, why go to the trouble to stage an international fractal art exhibit, and then act like the whole thing is some kind of classified secret?

Unless, for some reason, something about the show does need to be kept under wraps.  

~/~

And this came across the transom of the Ultra Fractal Mailing List recently:

From: Frederik Slijkerman <info@ultrafractal.com>
Date: Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 7:14 PM
Subject: [ultrafractal] IMPORTANT: Ultra Fractal mailing list has been moved
To: “ultrafractal@lists.fractalus.com” <ultrafractal@lists.fractalus.com>

Hi everyone,

The Ultra Fractal mailing list has been moved to the main ultrafractal.com server, so it also has a new address:

ultrafractal@list.ultrafractal.com

[...]

As you may know, until now this mailing list was running at fractalus.com, administered by Damien Jones. Damien has very generously offered server resources and his free time for more than ten years now, and I believe it is time for me to take over this task. Thank you, Damien, for everything you’ve done during all these years.

OT readers might recall that the main Ultra Fractal site moved off Fractalus earlier this year.  No explanation (other than what appears above) was given for moving the site and list off Jones’ server.  Last summer, after Fractalus went dark for a time, Jones offered this enigmatic statement on the UF List:

My role as a web site host is no longer required, and I cannot fulfill that role adequately in any case (especially not for those sites that have moved on).

Nothing stays the same forever. Nor should it.

Nor did it, apparently, although, like so many of Jones’ activities, the reasons for this UF hosting break remain strictly hush hush.

But I do see some progress.  At least Jones didn’t resort to his previous tactic of booting folks (who merely disagree with him) off Fractalus by ginning up phony charges of protecting his server from alleged "security threats."

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

Frames, drains and hurricanes

Posted by Tim - 28/07/10 at 11:07 pm

Many people have a favorite sport.  Some follow soccer, others american football or hockey, basketball, baseball, cricket…  I follow hurricanes, the tropical storms or cyclones that form in the Carribean during summer and fall of every year.  There’s never a players strike and you can follow all the action over the internet.  In fact, you really don’t want to buy tickets to see any of these “games” live.  The American National Hurricane Center gives you the best seat in town, or out of town, rather.  There’s only one team but everybody loses.  And it’s impossible to cheat.  It’s a funny sport.

This year was supposed to be much more energetic, which was a great relief after the incredibly disappointing 2009 season.  I’m still waiting for a really big, Category 4 or 5, game this year.  Bonnie was so pathetic the NHC stopped talking about her before she even made landfall which, in this game, is ordinarily the main event.  She just went back to being a depression –tropical depression.

They don’t name them only after women anymore, they’ll use any name.  They ought to let the folks living in the path of the hurricane suggest the names.  But they’ve got more important things on their minds –hiding, dodging, staying alive.

Life is the sport of sports and art is its World Cup.  But that’s coming from a guy who thinks hurricane season is more fun to watch than the SuperBowl.

Back to fractal art:  here’s a piece of fractal artwork by Deviant Art member Sophiiiii that caught my eye just this week and also strongly suggested –hurricane– to me.  (That’s Sophi with five “eyes”.)

- Click on any of the images below to view them full size and on their original site -

Ghosty Frosty by Sophiiiii on Deviant Art

This image (by “Five-Eyed Sophi”) has a number of interesting aspects.  Although, from the title, she probably didn’t intend it to have a marine theme much less that of a hurricane, it fits well into this and I think she saw a similar terrifying weather theme from her choice of the word, frost.  But maybe the spider web is the terrifying theme here?

I guess that’s the thing with “imaginary” art: the image is open to a number of interpretations, each one arising from the personal context the image unavoidably becomes mixed up in when it engages the viewer’s mind.

It was made in Incendia and I suspect has a few other layers incorporated into it, such as the spider web and the cloudy, watery background.

As I was saying about hurricanes, they are “wrathful” creatures that arise almost out of nothing and quickly grow (within days sometimes) into massively destructive beasts.  They are also composed, not of a neat circulation pattern which we see in the simplified diagrams used to explain them, but of broken and winding bands of thunderstorms and sometimes tornadoes spawned by those thunderstorms.  Sophiiiii’s image here, although completely artificial, is an excellent example of such an “extreme weather phenomenon”.

And it looks good too.  Incendia seems to have this nice ability to make grainy images that are more characteristic of real world imagery than the slick smooth world of computers, but I think Sophiiiii has added a lot of her own artistic talent to make this one looks a well as it does.

Tulum, 1988, Acrylic and Pastel on Paper, 18 x 20, by Peter Alexander

Sure.  This one’s not a fractal.  But when you’re floating in the ocean off the coast of Quintana Roo where Mexico meets Belize and the rest of Central America, such things are incidental.  There is the hint of shore in the dark bottom we see through the water, but where is it?  This is the morning after the hurricane.  It’s beautiful.  Out there somewhere is your house, but take heart, there’s plenty of building materials all around you.  One of them must have hit you and knocked you out.

I read an anectdote about hurricane Hattie that erased Belize City back in the 60s.  The author, a young boy at the time, told about how his family had completely lost their house (built on the beach, incidentally) but then a week later his father and uncle were out fishing and found a better one that the storm had dropped off from somewhere else.  I’ll bet there’s a lot of that shuffling of property going on in the wake of hurricanes every year.

Westmoreland, 2009, monoprint, 12 7/8 x 14 5/8, by Peter Alexander

Obviously this isn’t a fractal either, but Peter Alexander has made palm trees into such a separate and well developed genre much like the fractal spiral is in fractal art that they deserve a mention.  Click on the image to see the whole collection.  Very colorful.  I had a hard time picking the best one because they’re all very interesting.  Monoprints are prints that are made with unique characteristics and thus not reproducible merely by making another impression with the plate.  (I’ll bet they sell for more too.)  I think the coloring here is very sophisticated and carefully done.  I don’t like a lot of contemporary art (of the paintbrush sort) but these palm trees are something completely different.  Better than Warhol?

Revived by Sophiiiii

This one is just fantastic.  Color, shadows, lighting, contrast; it’s like a carefully painted old master’s work, laboriously rendered and painstakingly perfected.  That’s what Incendia can do when the right person is clicking it’s buttons.  I guess it’s a bit like paintbrushes: what comes from them depends on who’s holding them.  This is sort of weird, but I think the real beauty of this work is in what the image is reflecting.  It’s the light source that we don’t see.  There’s something golden, shining and radiant in this image –off screen– and it’s all suggested by what we see in the image.  The question is not, “What is this?” but rather, “Where are we?”  This is a great place.

To me this image is sea shells and other sea debris caught in a tangle of branches on the shore after that world cup of storms –a hurricane.  Neatly collected, I see.  Apparently the best time to collect sea shells is right after a storm (the key word is “after”).  That might also be the best time to check and see if your neighbors are still alive, so you’ll have to chose between the two.  Of course if your neighbors are down on the beach… with the seashells…

Sophiiiii added a link on her Deviant Art page to the image she used as the background for this image.  It’s worth looking at too.

Colour Acrylic 20 by Tackon (Deviant Art)

I find it interesting how the background complements the incendia image.  It may seem trivial, but the background layer, even just a colored texture like this, just like the frame on a painting, is part of the artwork and contributes to the viewer’s general impression in ways which I suspect can be quite strong even if they may appear subtle at first glance.  Speaking of frames…

What came first?  The Picture or the Frame?

Flickr’s thesmartestfish (Sophia Brueckner) said “experimenting with some vintage round picture frames I bought on etsy. I was thinking it would be interesting to have a series of paintings in round frames. not sure if I want to keep going in this direction though.”

(Etsy.com apparently is a website that describes itself as “Your place to buy and sell all things handmade, vintage, and supplies.”)

Thesmartestfish really is pretty bright.  Not only is she a Master of Fine Arts student, she also works with javascript to create generative imagery using the Processing platform; a nice combination of skills we could all use.  From this I suspect she either printed and embellished by paintbrush the images in her round collection (similar to monoprinting) or just painted them freehand using their simple but characteristic, generative look as a guide.  Either way she’s produced something quite appealing.

Here they are; nicely photographed, too.

Round Painting Collection by smartestfish (Flickr)

Untitled Round Painting by smartestfish

Untitled Round Painting by smartestfish

Untitled Round Painting by smartestfish

Untitled Round Painting by smartestfish

Javascript-photoshop1 by smartestfish

The round paintings look hand-painted but the bottom image the author describes as “shapes generated by javascript + photoshop with a scanned watercolor background.”

It’s a strange dynamic between frame and picture but there’s more dynamism going on.   Consider the interplay between the digital imagery of the javascript-photoshop process and thesmartestfish’s own hand painting skills.  Thesmartestfish created the javascript which in turn produced the snakey tendril imagery.  But that computer generated imagery in turn went on to inspire the hand made images in the round picture frames.  From such well defined and synergistic rotation often comes a powerful hurricane.  But it has to stay well out at sea, away from land, and feed on  warm waters and also avoid the vertical shearing forces of interfering ridges and troughs which dissipate the force of that rising energy coming off the sea.  Hey, some people like to talk in football or baseball analogies.  I prefer hurricanes.

Finally, everything flows back to where it came.  Solomon remarked on this very thing almost three thousand years ago: “All streams flow into the sea, yet the sea is never full.  To the place the streams come from, there they return again.  All things are wearisome, more than one can say.”

Ouch.  Here’s a fine illustration of that somewhat depressing/encouraging quotation.  It’s in the form of a video screen capture of a highly talented java applet rendering Fractal Drainage Patterns.  This is extremely fractal.  But I doubt it would have cheered up Solomon: everything is just sinking into the earth and if you watch the applet long enough at the original site, everything eventually fades into nothing.

Get the Flash Player to see this content.

I think they’re cool.  They’ve got a weird, sci-fi, Andromeda Strain replicating space-virus look to them.  I suppose epidemics and even wars have similarities to sports, just like hurricanes season does.  But hurricane season has a much more regular, reliable schedule than those other disasters even if all the hurricane game dates are impossible to predict ahead of time except by more than just a few days.  I should go check right now.  There’s a new update at the NHC about every four hours.  The next big one could be boiling away as we speak.

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

Surf’s up

Posted by Tim - 22/07/10 at 01:07 pm

I’ve been surfing.  From the noisey beaches of Deviant Art to the silent shores of guano islands.  Every one here’s a gem to me.  Each one gleamed in its own way when I saw it.

Remember this:  There are things that can be bought for a few glass beads in the South Seas that can be sold for a king’s ransom back in Amsterdam.  But remember this also:  there are things that can be bought for a king’s ransom in Amsterdam that are worth nothing more than a few glass beads in the South Seas.

Click on any of the images to see them full-size and on their original website where you can browse more works by the artists.

The Complex by David Makin

Dave seems to make a very wide variety of fractal imagery and works almost entirely, I believe, in Ultra Fractal.  I’ve never seen anything quite like this.  A city of dreidels?  The surface texture suggest some old kind of nylon material.  There’s a strange vintage radio tube feeling to it.  Nice, subtle coloring that reinforces the 20s or 30s Art Deco style (before the time of brightly colored plastics).  A rather unique image with a similarly unique style.

Daniel White Julia Mode by Bent-Winged Angel

Strange electronic vibes and I like strange electronic vibes.  Perhaps an unusual image to draw attention to, but who cares about the usual images?  I suspect this one was uploaded as part of a Fractalforums.com discussion, but that just adds to it’s exotic allure.  Maybe Bent-Winged Angel wasn’t trying to make a piece of art with this one, but she did.  It splashes like water but turns into grains of sand around the edges.  Far out.

Graffiti by Talfrac

Talfrac adds that the image was made with Fractal Imaginator.  This is a program by Terry Gintz that I’ve never tried.  I like the clean, solid, silkscreen rendering style that the image has.  Sharp, crisp colors.  Anyone familiar with fractals will recognize the common organic structure to the image despite it’s very untraditional –vector-like– blocky rendering style.  This looks more “art gallery” like than most of the smooth, millions of colors fractal images normally seen.

20091226-1 by Samuel Monnier

Full color or black and white, a good image is simply a good image.  Art’s funny that way.  Working with the most advanced and feature rich formats doesn’t guarantee anything.  Of course there’s nothing simple or retro about this image here by Samuel Monnier.  It’s another example of his sophisticated pattern piling technique that he’s been polishing over the years and developing with Ultra Fractal.  Click on the image to go to the original site where you can explore the vast algorithmic world which we are only seeing as a mere thumbnail here.  There’s  so many interesting things to see in this one.  It’s like a table of contents for a large anthology.

FRAC-tional Friction by Lenord

This is a mandelbox, I’m guessing.  Not your average type of mandelbox and not the usual style.  Strong design is what makes this one special.  Everything lined up and arranged in a careful display of shape, form and symmetry –but with the usual mandelbox variations and complexity to it.  Look closely, is it really symmetrical?  anywhere?  All an artist really does is help us to see the great scenes going on around us that us common folks don’t seem to notice.  I think that’s what Lenord’s done with this one: he’s helped us to see the simple shapes and the sophisticated patterns made in the mandelbox by cutting out all the usual distractions of surface texture and wild, vast perspective.  Yes, art is complex, but only when you analyze it.  Out in the wild it’s natural and instinctive.  But that’s why it sneaks past us so easily.

Pipe Organ "Klais ' by DeadZero (on Deviant Art)

What are those men doing in a fractal?  Believe it or not, this is actually a photograph of a very elaborately designed pipe organ somewhere in Spain.  Or maybe it really is a fractal and the author cleverly edited the image?  Never let your right eye know what your left eye is looking at.

The Eye of Silence by Max Ernst (1944)

I often feel that fractal art is not really about fractals but is instead about “imaginary” imagery.  In that sense, there are many “pre-columbian” fractals out there; meaning they are graphically similar although completely unrelated in terms of the way they were made.  Fractals just make it easier to create imaginary imagery.  I guess it depends on how you chose to define the art form.  The lack of a fractal formula naturally makes it hard to call  “fractal”.  Well, in the old days fractal artists worked hard.  Try doing something like this.

Incendia Sketch by Kaeltyk (Deviant Art)

This one’s for real.  I stumbled on Kaeltyk’s Deviant Art gallery somehow.  I forget how.  Maybe from a link in someone else’s favorites?  Incendia does some nice things, but I’ve never seen such a good combination of 3D and 2D elements like there is in this one by Kaeltyk.  And it’s black and white, too.  Black and white is a whole new kind of color.  The uber-color.  It’s often thought of as being being feature-poor as opposed to feature-rich.  But all the colors in the world can’t do what black and white does.  More strangeness.

Tilings II by Kaeltyk

This one by Kaeltyk was done in Ultra Fractal.  I just like these peaceful drifting snowflakes and the different landscapes they seem to be falling and dissolving into.  It’s hard to crop out just the right piece from among such a huge mass of repeating imagery like this, but Kaeltyk did a good job here.  Very professional looking.  It deserves a classy title and black frame.

Shells by Kaeltyk

I would have guessed Incendia for this one, but Kaeltyk’s notes for this one indicate it was made with Xenodream.  I know these sorts of spirally seashell/horns are common and perhaps even cliche now, but Kaeltyk has managed to create something interesting and appealing even in such a heavily picked over genre.  In Kaeltyk’s own words, “I like how it’s clean and almost carved.”  That’s why I like it too.  The coloring and surface texture adds a lot as well.

Sky by Marco Gervasio (Flickr)

According to notes for this image it was made by “two pictures of the sky that I merged together and then reversed”.  I guess the inverting created the yell0w-orange coloring from the natural blue sky tones in the original.  I include this because it’s another “mind-bender” that show that when we look at graphical imagery and ignore how it was made, we find “fractals” in places we wouldn’t have expected.  Although the shapes and structure of clouds really are a natural form of fractal rendering.  I guess that just reinforces my point.

Sphere by spanzhang (Renderosity)

“FMF + POV-Ray”  POV-Ray is a ray-tracing (ultra realistic) program, but I’m not sure what FMF stands for.  I like planetoids and this one’s got some cool coloring and texture.  Looks like ice cream that’s just about to start dripping.  Incidently this was chosen for a Fractal Window Weekly on Renderosity a year and a half ago.  I visited cgpad.com, the so-called Chinese Fractal Art Society and I think maybe Ferry Man Fractal is the mysterious “FMF”.  I’ve never heard of the program, so maybe spanzhang made it himself?

Rings and Wires by spanzhang

By spanzhang again.  He’s got a gallery at span.cgpad.com.  This one’s made with Apophysis.  Nice design with repeating circular elements and good colors.

Onceinalifetimesingle by Anonymous

Yes, people used to dream of such imaginary, fractal-like imagery way back in the 70s.  But it’s not merely once in a lifetime today; it’s everyday and all the time.  Music’s gotten a lot cheaper now too.  Hasn’t it?  And who needs to pay to get great artwork for their album covers nowadays with all this computer made stuff around?  “And you may ask yourself…” how come nobody sings about having mental breakdowns and emotional decay anymore?

Seed Bead Fractals by Shala Kerrigan

Check out the nice set of instructions Shala has made to go with this example of Fractal Earrings.  “Fractals are geometric patterns that show self-similarity, they can be very complex and really beautiful.”  Doesn’t that statement by Shala answer the proverbial, “What are fractals?” question quite nicely?

You can also bead fractals. This is a pair of earrings that uses a very simple fractal pattern to create a delicate fringe or tassel that resembles some of the fractals you can see in nature like trees or the veins in your body.
The shape I used was 3 lines. Each time you add another set of 3 lines to the ends of the lines, that’s called an iteration.

For folks like myself such descriptions are more enlightening than those of the more technical type.  You’d think by now I’d know what a fractal is.  But I keep finding fractals that don’t fit the formulas.  Never let your left brain know what you’re right brain is thinking.

You’ll only end up slapping yourself in the face.

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

Art imitates Nintendo

Posted by Tim - 16/07/10 at 03:07 pm

The original Mandelbox?

I don’t play video games much; just an hour every day of Star Wars Battlefront (original one).  I have friends in Mos Eisley and although they always lose –horribly– they’re always asking me to come out and “play”.

My nephew loaned us his old GameCube and while I’ve never used it because all we have for it are Super Mario games, it’s been there on the floor in front of the TV for almost a year now.   I glance at it occasionally in between ferociously savage bouts of Battlefront ( Dark Trooper… Rhen Var Citadel…shotgun in the sky).

Since the discovery of the Mandelbox by Tom Lowe (Tglad) early in this year with it’s general cube formation and multiple grid and curved structures in it, I’ve looked at the Nintendo Gamecube differently.  They seem to be derived from the same formula.  Could it be true?

Mandelbox Edition: Nintendo GameCube -- no word from Nintendo yet regarding release date. Which one's the power button? (Image by MarkJayBee)

You can see the common structural elements from the GameCube here in this Mandlebox image. Nintendo GameCube: GoldBox Edition. (Image by Timeroot)

The Mandelbox has much improved and much more stylish ventilation ducts than it's predecessors. Does this mean they've added a huge amount of processing power, or is it just for aesthetics? (Image by Tom Lowe)

If Nintendo ever brings the Mandelbox GameCube into full scale production the first one ought to go to the Museum of Modern Art. (Image by Tom Lowe)

Exploring the graphical output of fractal algorithms should give you a floating feeling from time to time as you experience that “I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore” feeling that Dorothy did when she found herself in Oz.  The world of video games is not so different either;  they’re as real as any movie you can see on your TV screen.  What we find in fractal graphics today would have passed for pure science fiction in the past.  What else?  3D fractals are the best game in town.

Anyhow, I just keep looking at that GameCube and can’t help but notice the resemblance to the Mandelbox.

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

Weird Scenes Inside the Goldmine

Posted by Tim - 10/07/10 at 06:07 pm

There’s actually a lot of goldmines out there in the outer reaches of our computer system.  None of us have been to all of them, but we’ve all been to some of them.  I don’t know where exactly this one is, but you can find all the scenes from it here.

This is what’s written at the entrance to the mine:

A gallery of large graphs

graph drawing of matrices in the University of Florida Collection

Graph visualization is a way to discover and visualize structures in complex relations. What sort of structures are people who do large scale computation studying? We can get a glimpse by visualizing the thousands of sparse matrices submitted to the University of Florida Sparse Matrix collection using sfdp algorithm . The resulting gallery contains the drawing of graphs as represented by 2328 sparse matrices in this collection. Each of these sparse matrices (a rectangular matrix is treated as a bipartite graph) is viewed as the adjacency matrix of an undirected graph, and is laid out by a multilevel graph drawing algorithm. If the graph is disconnected, then the largest connected component is drawn. The largest graph (Schenk@nlpkkt240) has 27,993,600 vertices and 366,327,376 edges. A simple coloring scheme is used: longer edges are colored with colder colors, and short ones warmer. The graphs are in alphabetical order. Use the “Search” link to find graphs of specific characters.

from: http://www2.research.att.com/~yifanhu/GALLERY/GRAPHS/index1.html

The computer awoke before dawn, he put his boots on

What page in a mathbook ever looked like this?

I should have been a bag of glowing mesh, gliding across the floors of silent seas

I argued with infinity. I wish I hadn't.

I just like it

Somewhere, this was the topic of an advanced technical discussion

It looks like this

And this too

Why? Why did it do that?

you don't know what you're digging, until it's been dug

1. I got a handle on it 2. I had a handle on it 3. What's a handle?

The machine is humble and efficient. It would draw another picture before it would ever sign its name.

Another picture

This could be a sub-atomic energy cloud, or a map of the universe

It all makes sense, the longer you stare at it

We know art doesn't have to be useful, but do we also know that art doesn't have to be useless?

It's perfect. What does perfect mean?

The elegant effervescence of electricity

It pretends to be a car, and slips away unseen

Can a prison cell be a work of art?

So little, so much

Thanks to but does it float for helping me find the Goldmine.

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

FUC Redux

Posted by cruelanimal - 05/07/10 at 07:07 pm

Your decorative eye candy can once more be filled...

I’ve been reiterated from the undead.

[Image seen on Amazon.com.]

The Fractal Universe Calendar (FUC) returns with a makeover.

Previously put out by Avalanche Publishing, it is now under the aegis of Mosely Road Publishers which describes it as

full of the most visually arresting fractals.

Let’s see if you agree.  Here’s a sneak peak:

 

Fractal like it’s 1999.

[Image seen on calendars.com.]

Now, are you ready to hear a litany of complaints from me about the ethics of this venture.  Okay.  Here goes…

I don’t really have any.

That’s because my concerns about previous iterations of the FUC sprung from the manner in which it was administered.  The old FUC was clearly a competition, despite its organizers’ protests to the contrary, and one that too comfortably favored the work of present and former editors — sometimes to the tune of 40% of the selected material.  Editors were compensated by having their own work included — and then were allowed to send more of their own work on to the judges — who, oddly enough, were never identified.  In other words, the whole shebang was ethically suspect.

I have no idea how the new FUC is run, but I doubt it’s a contest.  There is absolutely no information on the web about any call for entries, rules, deadlines, and so forth.  In fact, other than a few retail-based references, the only other link to the new FUC I find is on silwanka’s deviantART page where she says she was "chosen" for this new calendar.  Therefore, I suspect the publisher directly contacted each of the included artists.

This is how the whole enterprise should have been run from the start.  As a commercial venture, calendar publishers want to sensibly make a profit and thus will likely select whatever work they believe will sell.  What they can’t do, ethically anyway, is run a thinly veiled contest that inordinately favors its own current and past administrators.

So I have no reason to question the ethics of new FUC.  But I do have a few observations.

* How can the new publishers use the same title for their calendar?  A quick glimpse at the old FUC page claims that the "Fractal Universe" name is a registered trademark.  Did Avalanche sell the rights to Mosely Road?  Or is there so little financially at stake here that Avalanche hasn’t bothered to challenge the trademark infringement?  Or is this a completely new venture — and no one apparently cares enough about the whole thing to be bothered by the appropriation?

* It’s nice to see a bit more variety in the selections — and to even find an Apophysis image on the cover.  Still, if you miss the eye candy laden aesthetic of the old FUC, you can always order the new Infinite Creations fractal calendar from Orange Circle Studio.  This is the old FUC in spirally spirit (if not name) and promises that

in this calendar, renowned fractal artists push their art to extremes and guide you on a journey through their infinite creations.

Who these "renowned fractal artists" are isn’t made clear from the promotional material.  Still, you can see thumbs of this more FUC than the new FUC calendar on my last FUC post.

* The fractal artists, renowned or otherwise, aren’t identified in promo stuff for the new FUC either.  But we are told that their work is "visually arresting."  And it is.  If you plunged into a fractal hot tub time machine and wormholed back about ten years.  To my eyes, these selections, with a few exceptions, look middlingly generic — and more likely to appear in a math textbook rather than a mass-marketed art artifact.

* It’s worth pinching yourself and explicitly noting that all of this work is in a calendar and not in a gallery.  Calendar.com tosses its fractal calendars into the "Fantasy Art" bin.  So, included "renowned artists," before your heads get too big, just remember that you’re rooming with unicorns, faeries, hobbits, dragons, wizards, elves, goddesses, shamans, muses, and pixies.  Does that elbow-rubbing ground you any?

* As for the question as to whether or not these commercial products — soon to be showcasing fractal art in bookstores and strip mall gift shops near you — is a fair, representative sampling of the artistic capabilities of our discipline is one I’ll leave for the blog’s readers to mull over.

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

Bow the Knee to Blob!

Posted by Tim - 03/07/10 at 12:07 am

Alien Ruins by blob on Fractalforums.com (click for full-size)

Such simple rendering and yet, such powerful rendering.  Remember, most of MC Escher’s great drawings were done in pencil, so there’s no reason why a grayscale or monotone image has to be dull.  Just look at the detail in blob’s image, how it’s all over the place in every nook and cranny and has such creative diversity.  This is the magic of great software and those who know how to get the most out of it.

It’s made in Jesse’s Dierks’ free program, Mandelbulb 3D 1.53.  The expression, “the proof of the pudding is in the eating” really applies to fractal programs: you can judge them by what users are able to make with them.  As you can see here, Jesse’s program is clearly top notch.  I’m really surprised that such high quality software continues to be made in the fractal world.  I guess the new 3D formulas have inspired programmers like Jesse to create these new things.

Here’s another in the same palette but with more of a carved ivory look to it:

Electron Microscopy by blob from Fractalforums.com (click for full-size)

Again, subtle rendering that magnifies the beautiful designs of the hybrid mandelbox/sierpinski formula.  The top left corner I find to be the most interesting, next to the large round cavity in the center.  Everywhere you look there seems to be something a little different.  I’ll bet one could get completely lost exploring this object and forget all about taking snapshots.  Makes the Grand Canyon look like a ditch.

Just to show some contrast in rendering styles, take a look at these two by Kraftwerk:

the Giant alien Generaator, by Kraftwerk

This is no pencil drawing, but the lavish gold and metallic emerald surfaces look good in this mandelbox.

In his own words:

This is just too much for me, found this yesterday evening, sitting in the garden sun, two different worlds…

These formulas really makes you feel that they are designs from another world… first time I feel that mathematics really can beat the human fantasy… mindblowing…

Thank you everyone involved in this @ fractalforums, I think the things you all found is bigger than anyone of us can imagine!

-from http://www.fractalforums.com/index.php?action=gallery;sa=view;id=2759

There’s more images like this by Kraftwerk to be seen on his Deviant Art page, they all come from the internal details of this intriguing mandelbox structure:

Alien Generaator Building by Kraftwerk (click for full-size)

I think the starry background has been added in, but it sure fits with this extraterrestrial space temple.  The coloring is really exceptional.  Kraftwerk has a real talent for that.  He’s made some of the best colored mandelbulbs I’ve ever seen.  He’s also using Jesse’s Mandelbulb 3D just like blob.  I find it quite interesting that both of them can use the same program and get equally good results and yet with such widely varying styles.  Fractal programs are bit like musical instruments: it’s not what you play but how you play it.

I can’t resist adding YouTube content to my postings.  So here’s a recording of the original Kraftwerk music group of “The Voice of Energy” which inspired fractal Kraftwerk’s title for this series of mandelbox images.  It’s in German.

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

Diaries

Posted by cruelanimal - 01/07/10 at 04:07 pm

Dear Diary,

I’ve been thinking recently about the creative explosion of Mandelbulbs and Mandelboxes.  Sometimes, I think they represent the latest new wave in fractal art.  Other times, I wonder if they are just the latest it iteration.  After a few thousand bulbs and boxes replete the gallery coffers of Fractalbook, will these once novel forms be yesterday’s quats and flames?

I do enjoy looking at them though.

Your Penpal

~/~

Dear Diary,

I’m not surprised that folks gave up trying to talk sense to Chris Oldfield (milleniumsentry) about his production of (I guess) pure fractals in their "native environment" of Ultra Fractal.  Oldfield, like those unknown sources in the Bush Administration, prefers to "create his own reality."  If Oldfield thinks something, that thought is immediately reified as truth.  If Oldfield believes that permission must be obtained to use one of his images, then it must be definitively so.  No amount of time spent pointing out that Fair Use exceptions in copyright law allow such reproduction for the purposes of reviews or satire will change his closed mind.  He’d rather have you believe that Tim and I are rude for displaying images while writing a blog of fractal art criticism.

Likewise, Oldfield has drunk the UF kool-aid from a Big Gulp cup.  UF’s greatest achievement, I think, was winning the propaganda war — that is, building graphic processing features into their software while simultaneously convincing UF users they are not really doing any graphics processing at all.  See, it’s that unique "native environment" that allows UF users to layer fractals like Pringles and import static media like a photograph but still churn out a bona fide "fractal" — even if, technically, the result is now a collage — an algorithmic mash-up. 

And I still occasionally see this proud disclaimer on Fractalbook: "Made with UF.  100(+) layers.  No post-processing."

Let’s see if I understand the dynamic here. Because Oldfield used the Photoshop-Lite features built into UF, his "fractal" is pure as the driven pixel?  But, if I use Photoshop, whose filters also run using algorithms, I’m creating a kind of bastardized, non-fractal, digital-like art?

Not even UF enthusiast Damien M. Jones believes that hype.  

Personally, I agree with Terry W. Gintz’s observation:

It is pointless to continue to argue that rendering layers of fractals is some kind of advanced or superior approach to fractal generation, or that one program is all you need to create great fractals. It is a great selling point for the benefit of fractal novices, and to eliminate the excess fractal programmer population, but it does nothing to advance the science of fractal imaging.

By the way, I wrote this part of my blog post directly in Dreamweaver.  389 words.  No post-processing.

Your Penpal

~/~

Dear Diary,

I’m a little dismayed that at least one of the Bulbers-Boxers reverted to some very old wave thinking in an OT comment.  Ker2x, responding to an image by Oldfield, notes:

Btw… it still look nice, but i have no interest in this kind of artwork.
i like the beauty we can (surprisingly) find in mathematic and chaos.

To paraphrase: My fractal is purer than yours — even if you’ve just spent considerable time arguing how pure yours is.  Mine is 100% algorithmic-mathematical-fractal.  Yours is a "derivative."  Mine is right and true and good.  Yours is "this kind of artwork."

I have little patience for such braggadocio elitism.  It sticks in my craw when the UF cultists pull this stunt.  It’s just as unbecoming when it surfaces in the Boxer-Bulber crowd.

You made an aesthetic choice, dude, revolving around the extent of your use of graphics processing.  That choice doesn’t make you somehow nobler than the rest of us who’ve consciously made a different choice than yours.

Your Penpal

~/~

Dear Diary,

What Oldfield probably doesn’t realize is that I’m actually on his side.  If he wants to produce fractal stratum, whether purely or impurely, I say go for it.  Supercollide your fractals to pulp, for all I care.  My thinking has always been to do whatever’s necessary to get the art you want.  My maxim:  More talk about art.  Less talk about purity.

I’ve already outlined my thoughts about the aesthetic choices one can make while navigating the sliding scale between algorithmic art and graphically processed art in this exchange with Tim.  No need to rehash here.

I have no beef with fractalists who want to mask and layer and process until the seahorses come home.  My gripe is with those who insist their tools are somehow special and thus elevate them to a higher plane where the air is more rarefied than the processed smog we derivative losers are forced to breathe.

Your Penpal

~/~

Dear Diary,

I’ve been thinking about this post (nearly two years ago now) by Tim where he worries that Ultra Fractal is increasingly becoming a program "for engineers only."  Tim observes that

A lot of work has gone into Ultra Fractal, and from the looks of Ultra Fractal 5, a lot of work is continuing to go into it. But what I question is whether that work is making Ultra Fractal a better tool for the average user to make fractal art or is simply making a better tool for the developers and beta testers to play with and “oooh” and “aaah” over. Ultra Fractal 5 strikes me as the fractal programmer’s fractal program.

I wonder how many of UF’s users lost their bearings in the move from v4 to v5?  How many of those users lack the programming mindset and instead make fractal art by an instinctive process using serendipity?  Are they now cast overboard — left to drown unless they quickly enroll in a Visual Arts Academy UF course in order to re-learn the basic operating procedures for their tools? 

This sounds like a deliberate marketing strategy to me.  Here’s betting that UF v6 will need the coursework for an advanced degree to decode its inner workings.

Or is there just no place for serendipity in fractal art anymore?  If not, then let’s see no more work by artists, please.  The work of the makers of brushes and paints and canvases will be satisfactory enough, thank you.

Your Penpal

~/~

Dear Diary,

I worry that Fractalbookers think I dislike them.  I don’t.  Mostly.  But I really dislike the environmental trappings of Fractalbook.

Fractalbook is fine for social interaction — for getting artistic tips and advice — for having your ego massaged daily — for self-declaring yourself a master.  But it’s lousy place to showcase your art.

Especially to outsiders.  As a virtual museum, Fractalbook is far too muddled — mostly extolling social networking accouterments and oodles of self-promotion.  Take deviantART (please!).  How’s your art look against that puce background and officious busyness exploding from every available pixel?  At least Renderosity has the good sense to use a black background.  Now, if only those vampy sorceresses and seductive Indian princesses in their underwear weren’t enticing visitors from the borders of nearly every frame.

I see good art on these places all the time, but I’m reluctant to send OT’s readers into these cluttered lairs of virtual ass-kissing and unfettered commercialism.  Is this really how you want people (and your virtual friends swooning over your every render don’t count) to see your work?  You do have a web site or a blog, right?  A safe and quiet haven where the public can reflect on your work without virtual saturation barrage fire, yes?

No?  Then I suggest you’re more interested in hanging out with your laudatory friends than having art lovers hang out with your work.

Your Penpal

~/~ 

Tags:  

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

7Up: The Un-Cola

Posted by Tim - 28/06/10 at 02:06 pm

What exactly does it mean to be un-Cola?  Cola drinks, like Coca-Cola, are dark-colored and contain caffeine.  The opposite would be light-colored without caffeine?  But both of them are sugary, carbonated drinks sold on the same shelf and dropping out of the same vending machine, or at least side by side vending machines (7Up is a product of Pepsico, Coke’s rival).

To those who like soft drinks and don’t like colas, then 7Up is perhaps very different.  Refreshingly different. But for those who are simply thirsty and don’t want to eat 10 teaspoons of sugar while trying to quench their thirst, 7Up and every other soft drink, including all the various members of the vast cola club, are all one thing:  cans of liquid candy.

Mosaics:  The Un-Fractal!

60s Scream, by Village9991

These mosaics, including the so-called mashups that are made of tiny images, are a kind of un-cola with respect to fractal art.  Their ingredients, like 7Up’s ingredients, are fundamentally different and yet seem to have all the same sweetness and fizz of regular fractals.

They look like fractals and from a purely visual standpoint, I enthusiastically declare them to be fractal art and insist they take their rightful place in that great vending machine –shining humming monolith of cold drink correct change worship– called fractal art.

And they’re cool to look at.  And maybe not so hard to make, either?  This one above I believe is a rendition of the screaming woman in the shower scene of Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho.  There’s something called actionscript which does some really neat things like this.  Flash artists do similar things.  I have no idea how it works.  Wouldn’t it be funny if they used some type of fractal algorithm to scale the mosaic pieces?

You can view a whole bunch of them here on Village9991′s Mosaici page.  He’s Italian and lives in a small village in northern Italy.

Giant Peach by Jim Bumgardner

The full-size (1800×1800) image is here and is worth a look.  The details in this mash-up are quite appealing, unlike most which get ugly when you move up close.

Jim Bumgardner is a Flickr master and has done some prominent things:

I’m a computer technologist / artist / composer in the Los Angeles area. I blog about my various projects at krazydad.com.

I’ve done a lot of mosaic art using the Flickr APIs, and co-authored Flickr Hacks, from O’Reilly, with Paul Bausch.

I’m a little obsessed with circles, radial symmetry and mechanical instruments.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
I work amongst an awesome collective of nerd/hipsters at Topspin in Santa Monica.

I did some mosaic posters for squared circle, and a day in the life, here on Flickr:

[see Giant Peach image above]


* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
One of the first things I did on Flickr was to make a number of fun-to-use Flickr Colr Pickrs. Check ‘em out!

I also made the world’s first Flickr Chia Pet, an experiment in collaborative defacement.

- From Jim’s Flickr profile page

I made something similar once, using a photoshop filter called Mosaic Toolkit by Lance Otis.  Over here.

Pearl Glance by Village9991

Whaddaya know?  It’s the same guy as made the first one!  Well, I guess he’s got some sort of program to make these with because it would take a lot of work to draw these things even with a computer drawing program.

The woman, in case you don’t recognize her, is a detail from some very famous painting.  But here her image is made up of all the senseless words that people in art galleries have spoken while viewing the painting.  Individually, the words are gibberish and without any meaning.  But together they “speak” her image in a new but equally appealing way.  Some of the smallest comments are crucial details.  The other deep message in this image is: if you’ve got enough fonts installed on your computer you can do anything!

Time for another one:

Steal a Kiss by Village9991

Well hit my avatar with a digital two by four.  Same guy again.

He says it’s from a Pucca cartoon: YouTube Link.

The image has changed: it’s full of details that have their own (short) story to tell.

After watching a Pucca cartoon I now see the image differently.  I can clearly make out the two Pucca cartoon characters.  Nevertheless, the graphical effect is what makes this image interesting for me.  Those of you who are fans of the Pucca People you might feel differently.  Which is the greater art?

Blogging: The Un-Writing

I never intended to focus on the mosaic images of just one artist.  Incidentally, the way I review these things is a multi-step process and details like names often get temporarily lost in the shuffle.  First I wander around the internet and when I come upon an interesting image I bookmark the page.  This stores the link to the original (obviously) along with the image and any references to a title and author’s name.  Later on when I’m thinking of writing about something I go back to these collected bookmarks and I open up 10 or so from a single sub-folder bearing some (at the time) relevant name.  The folder names are often just dates like “June” or “May” or “3D”.  Digital art in general and fractal art as well is such an eclectic medium that meaningful sub-categories are hard to come up with.  And author names quite often aren’t the common ingredient in a particular graphical theme.

But sometimes they are. For me it’s all about art and not artists.  But you have to include the author’s name if for no other reason than readers want to know who made it.  Sometimes there are legal reasons such as attribution requirements.  Artists are less important in fractal art because individual accomplishment is more about the style of pushing buttons and operating the machine than it is about actually interacting with the canvas in the intimate way that painters do.  If you do what they did then you’ll “make” what they made.

Clearly, no one makes them like Village9991 does!

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

Fractal America

Posted by Tim - 25/06/10 at 02:06 pm

I’ve been looking at some mash-ups lately on Flickr ….and I was browsing around on Samuel Monnier’s site ….and July 4th, Independence Day in the States is coming up, …which is similar to Canada’s own national holiday on July 1st called Canada Day … I thought, “America Day” …and here’s two images of that great icon of America, the American Flag …and they’re both fractal, sort of …here’s Fractal America …the deeper you look, the more you see ...how close can you get?

20091103, by S. Monnier

United State of Art, by qthomasbower (on Flickr.com)

Click on either one to see a larger version with much more detail.  Samuel Monnier’s image leads to a page where you can view the image in enormous detail.  He uses a special flash applet that allows you to practically explore the image to the same degree you would be able to if you were viewing it in the original fractal program (Ultra Fractal) that made it.  If you haven’t seen one of these before, it’s well worth a look.

Can the image of a national flag (especially the American flag) be purely something to look at and not have political overtones?

No.  Absolutely not.   And why is that?

Because it’s a symbol.  Our minds just refuse to look at it as if we’d never seen it before.

In social situations, if you want to avoid controversy, “don’t talk about religion or politics”.  But the American flag is both  politics and religion to many people –and not just the Americans.

In Canada (where I live) you will probably hear much more said about Americans and America than you will in America and among Americans.  Canadians are funny that way.  And so is much of the world.  No one see America (and Americans) quite like foreigners do.  And no one seems to talk about them as much as foreigners do.  Canadians, however, see America in a more powerful way because we are both foreigners and yet, in many ways, very american ourselves.  I won’t get into it right now because it’s too convoluted and confusing, but suffice it to say that Canadians embrace America with one hand while at the same time trying to get in a punch with the other.  It’s very hypocrital and juvenile and, I’ll come right out and say it: it’s very colonial.  Colonial-minded peoples are afraid of independence –they think they’re going to lose something.  Americans, on the other hand, enthusiastically fought for independence –because they thought they would be gaining something.

And there, in a nutshell, is the difference between Canadians and Americans.  Canadians like to complain about the government and you can’t do that when you’re independent because you’re only complaining about yourself.  Americans like to fix the government and to do that you need independence and self-government.  America wrote it’s own constitution.  Canada was content to let the British Parliament do it for them.  As a Canadian I’ve always found it surprising that my fellow Canadians don’t seem to see this as a huge national embarrassment:  Canada is an act of British Parliament. America was a reformation of the acts of British Parliament (“new and improved”).

See?  Already things have gotten political.  I’m so glad that art doesn’t have to be that way.  Let’s talk about art instead.

Samuel Monnier says that fractal art doesn’t have to embrace social and political themes in order to be considered “serious art” and that if you browse through artworks of the past you’ll find many examples of good art in which these sorts of themes are not involved.  Maybe he didn’t say it exactly like that, but he’s right.  The works of Joan Miro and Paul Klee would be considered “serious art” and yet they (rarely) had any connection to what one would call social commentary.

Of course it would be a great compliment to fractal art if it also had some artwork that did engage in social commentary.  It’s not necessary (as Sam says) for fractal art to be earn the label, “serious”, but it would add another dimension to the genre.  And political themes can be quite engaging and thought provoking.

Back to the art:  Sam’s “pattern piling” version of the American flag is really without any sort of intended meaning (assuming that’s possible with the American flag).  It really is just an interesting, richly detailed, experiment with the geometric qualities that this flag possesses.  He does the same thing with the Swiss flag (Sam is from Switzerland) although the results aren’t quite as interesting because the Swiss flag’s elements are all right-angled and lack the variety that the stars of the American flag give to it.  And there’s an extra color in the American flag which in turn provides for more combinations and permutations when pattern piled.

Qthomasbower’s flag is, on the other hand, a deliberate attempt to provide social commentary:  A vast mosaic of many artworks forming (by overlaying an image of the flag) a diverse but united nation waving majestically in the wind.  I think the technique is easier than it looks.  Nevertheless the result is fascinating.  It really has the detailed and intricate wonder of an image made by the iterations of a fractal formula.

Qthomasbower has some more of these on his Flickr pages.  Unlike Monnier’s image, Q’s doesn’t look so hot when you zoom in.  It’s kind of like the “digital zoom” on a camera;  the picture just becomes chunkier and cruder as you move in.  I’m sure he’s not implying that the state of American art only looks good from a distance and when covered by the imprimatur of The Stars and Stripes.

Two of Arts by qthomasbower (on Flickr)

I find these mash-ups of Q to be very interesting because of the detail and texturing they give to the image when viewed at large.  I think almost any sort of half-decent image would look fantastic when treated this way.  It gives a large-scale and massive appearance to the image because of the non-repeating and highly detailed texture all the individual image “tiles” contribute.  The mash-up contributes really only a texture layer, but the effect, as I’ve said, is very impressive.

So.  Is America a fractal?  Does it have self-similarity at many levels?  Do parts of it descend down to zero while others escape to infinity? And why does a Presidential election with only two candidates take so long to render?

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.

Photoblog 1

Posted by cruelanimal - 21/06/10 at 02:06 pm

I don’t dislike everything.  The OT faithful probably know from past posts that I often see fractal art works I find interesting.

When Tim and I were first forming Orbit Trap and discussing its possibilities, one idea we knocked around was to post an occasional fractal art photoblog — that is, allow the blog to function as a kind of virtual gallery by offering images without comment.  Any reaction to the art works would come from OT’s readers in the form of comments.  Today seems as good a day as any to start.

So, here are a few pieces that have have caught my eye lately.  Some are Phase One works, and others are Phase Two.

Disclaimer: I might have a bigger-tent sense of what fractal art constitutes than you do.

Like or dislike, and, if so moved, feel free to say so:

Deep Sea Monster by Maria K. Lemming

Deep Sea Monster by Maria K. Lemming.  Seen on her web site.


Tvivla by Robert Töreki

Tvivla by Robert Töreki.  Seen on the Ultrafractal site.


Toy Fracture by Bermarte.  Seen on Fractal Forums.


Digging You Up Again by 2BORNO2B

Digging You Up Again by 2BORNO2B.  Seen on deviantART.


Cries from the Wetlands by Gaiadeiel

Cries from the Wetlands by Gaiadriel.  Seen on Renderosity.


The Water Tree by Hector Garrido

The Water Tree by Hector Garrido.  Seen on Armonia Fractal.


Iguana Eyes by Michael Kern

Iguana Eyes by Michael Kern.  Seen on Fractal Enightenment.


Fractal Recursive Spiral Pottery Pattern by Quasimondo.  Seen on Flickr.


Julia Bead Tapestry.  Seen on In Bits Mosaics.


Vent #3 by Thomas Briggs.  Seen on his web site.


~/~

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

If you enjoyed this article please consider staying updated via RSS. Links to your own social media pages could be added here.