{"id":5216,"date":"2013-11-12T20:10:24","date_gmt":"2013-11-13T01:10:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=5216"},"modified":"2013-11-12T20:10:24","modified_gmt":"2013-11-13T01:10:24","slug":"the-synthetic-aesthetic-5-surrealist-pioneers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=5216","title":{"rendered":"The Synthetic Aesthetic 5: Surrealist Pioneers"},"content":{"rendered":"

The work of some surrealist artists back in the early 20th century involved the use of creative methods that are almost analogous to many of our modern computerized algorithms and effects.\u00a0 For people like myself that are currently exploring the creative potential of photoshop filters and other graphically creative computer things, the smoke drawings, photo choppings and experimental painting techniques of the surrealists are an instructive as well as encouraging gift from the past.\u00a0 They are fellow “syntheticists” because even though they worked in a very different, non-digital medium, they merely worked with different machinery while pursuing the same graphical philosopher’s stone as the digital syntheticist does: creativity that isn’t trapped in the wheel-ruts of the human mind.<\/em><\/p>\n

Yes, human thought and expression can be plagued with “wheel-ruts”.\u00a0 Nothing shows this better than synthetic creativity.<\/p>\n

Surrealist art was obsessed with the human mind and in particular the so-called subconscious mind that was the focus of psychological investigators like Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung.\u00a0 While some surrealists explored their minds and created works based on that sort of self-directed, introspective method, others took a contrasting path and tried to provoke their imaginations and those of their audience’s from the outside with automatically created graphical works (“automatism”).\u00a0 (Check out Surrealist techniques<\/a> on the Wikipedia.)<\/p>\n

While psychiatry considers automatism reflexive and constricting, the Surrealists believed it was a higher form of behaviour. For them, automatism could express the creative force of what they believed was the unconscious in art. Automatism was the cornerstone of Surrealism. Andr\u00e9 Breton defined Surrealism in his Manifeste du surr\u00e9alisme (1924) as \u2018psychic automatism in its pure state\u2019. This automatism was \u2018dictated by thought, in the absence of any control exercised by reason, exempt from any aesthetic or moral concern\u2019.<\/p>\n

–Jennifer Gibson (From Grove Art Online) See MoMA Automatism<\/a><\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Surrealist art is a pretty broad subject and there’s a lot more to automatism than synthetic creativity so let’s just focus on what the Merriam Webster dictionary says about automatism<\/a>:<\/p>\n

suspension of the conscious mind to release subconscious images <automatism \u2014the surrealist trend toward spontaneity and intuition \u2014 Elle><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

This, from the Merriam Webster dictionary site is helpful too:<\/p>\n

Method of painting or drawing in which conscious control over the movement of the hand is suppressed so that the subconscious mind may take over. For some Abstract Expressionists, such as Jackson Pollock, the automatic process encompassed the entire process of composition. The Surrealists, having once achieved an interesting image or form by automatic or chance means, exploited the technique with fully conscious purpose. See also Abstract Expressionism, action painting, Surrealism.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As you can see, the concept of automatism diverges into a number of applications depending on how much the interfering influence of human artistry is excluded; but surely the creation of imagery through solely mechanical means is the purest application as such a mindless process excludes any sort of intentionality.\u00a0 The art (if any) is accidental.<\/p>\n

If you think that sounds like a recipe for junk then you ought to remind yourself that much of what is called fractal art is made this way.\u00a0 Many of the most confusing masses of graphical imagery found in the great (infamous?) works of\u00a0 Abstract Expressionism and Action Painting involved much more human artistry and involvement that the most heavily layered fractal artworks.\u00a0 We can all laugh at Jackson Pollock’s drip paintings but it’s the winners of the Benoit Mandelbrot Fractal Art Contests that are trying to get public recognition and acceptance in the art world, not Jackson Pollock, whose “junk” is now icons of 20th century art.<\/p>\n

But getting back to the freaky surrealist art techniques…<\/p>\n

I spoke about Decalcomania in the last part, Part 4<\/a>; it’s not really algorithmic like fractals are, but it is mechanical.\u00a0 One doesn’t draw with Decalcomania, they squish paint onto a canvas, or board with a glass plate and hope it provokes (after numerous attempts) something magnificent and deeply psychological.\u00a0 Probing the mind and exploring psychological themes was a big part of surrealism and that’s where the experimental imagery came in:\u00a0 Art as Rorschach test.<\/em><\/p>\n

Here’s an article on surrealist art techiques<\/a>.\u00a0 It seems to have formed the basis for the Wikipedia page about the same topic<\/a>.\u00a0 I wonder which came first?<\/p>\n

Fumage<\/strong><\/p>\n

They all seem to be French words.\u00a0 Here’s a quote:<\/p>\n

Another surrealist technique was known as fumage (smoking). Pioneered by Wolfgang Paalen (1907-1959) during the late 1930s, it involved placing a candle under a sheet of paper to form patterns of soot. Moving the candle varied the patterns.<\/p>\n

~Click on images to view on original site~<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\"Ciel<\/a>

Ciel de Pieuvre (1938) by Wolfgang Paalen<\/p><\/div>\n

Here’s an image made in the program, Fyre (no pun intended) that utilizes the Peter de Jong map (algorithm).\u00a0 Not exactly a great work of art like Paalen’s but I think it shows some similarity in the type of imagery formed by a smoky algorithm instead of a smoky candle.<\/p>\n

\"An

An image made with Fyre<\/p><\/div>\n

Of course the best modern computerized analogue to the surrealist’s Fumage technique would be the gas fractals made with Apophysis.<\/p>\n

Cubomania<\/strong><\/p>\n

Cubomania is a method of making collages in which a picture or image is cut into squares and the squares are then reassembled without regard for the image. The technique was first used by the Romanian surrealist Gherasim Luca.<\/p>\n

-from http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Cubomania<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"cubomanie-24<\/a>

cubomanie-24 by Gherasim Luca<\/p><\/div>\n

Here’s the Mona Lisa run through the photoshop filter, Flip Chop, made by Mario Klingemann:<\/p>\n

\"Mona

Mona meets Flip Chop<\/p><\/div>\n

The idea the surrealists had with chopping up photographs was to create the suggestion of something else, something new.\u00a0 The result was almost always an image that “worked” differently that the original.\u00a0 Naturally it was fragmented but there was also a creative and often psychologically stimulating effect from the new mental as well as physical arrangement.\u00a0 Flip chop does this with almost no influence from the “artist”.\u00a0 I’m sure there are other filters that will allow for more variation, like a random seed or something like that.<\/p>\n

Grattage<\/strong><\/p>\n

grat\u00b7tage (gr?-tazh’) n. A surrealist technique in painting in which (usually dry) paint is scraped off the canvas. It was employed by Max Ernst and Joan Mir\u00f3. [< Fr. “scraping”]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"Grattage<\/a>

Grattage 1955 by Mario Deluigi<\/p><\/div>\n

Yes, digital artists weren’t the first ones to go texture and gradient crazy.\u00a0 Do we need to see a digital example of this?\u00a0 Here’s something I made with a block wave filter that has the same effect, although not as elegant as Deluigi’s.<\/p>\n

\"Cherryorchard,

Cherryorchard, made with Showfoto’s block wave filter<\/p><\/div>\n

Click on Deluigi’s image to view several more.\u00a0 It’s a fascinating type of imagery and one that easily makes the move into the digital realm of synthetic imagery.<\/p>\n

Now scraping paint off a canvas isn’t exactly a hands-off technique, but other examples, especially by Max Ernst, also involve placing the soft canvas over a rough surface or item and yielding some of the shape or texture of the object underneath in the scraped canvas result.\u00a0 Ernst also used the technique to inspire himself and as the basis for other hand-painted final works.\u00a0 These synthetic methods of the surrealists, owing to their non-digital mediums, were not as mechanized and automated as today’s computerized methods are.<\/p>\n

The hallmark of synthetic art is the lack of intentionality.\u00a0 It’s lacking because the processes are disconnected from the artist’s conscious control.\u00a0 The artist works by remote control and through mechanical means.\u00a0 It makes the artist more productive as well as, perhaps, less of an artist in some people’s eyes.\u00a0 The artwork is what’s important, not how much we can boast about it.\u00a0 Surrealists pursued this unintentionality as much as their non-computerized tools would allow them precisely because they wanted imagery that was not an expression of an artist’s conscious (scheming, defensive, lying…) mind.<\/p>\n

What’s important to note is that they pursued such methods for their artistic value despite the fact that at first glance such methods seem to be the antithesis of art.\u00a0 The surrealists showed there’s artistic potential in the graphical synthesis of things like smoke, chopped up images, and scratched up canvases.\u00a0 Today’s photoshop filters and the persistent experimentation with cheap graphical effects continue the exploration of that vast, rut-less wilderness .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The work of some surrealist artists back in the early 20th century involved the use of creative methods that are almost analogous to many of our modern computerized algorithms and effects.\u00a0 For people like myself that are currently exploring the creative potential of photoshop filters and other graphically creative computer things, the smoke drawings, photo … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":5241,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5216","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/11\/cubomanie-24-by-Gherasim-Luca-sm.png?fit=260%2C160&ssl=1","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":388,"url":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=388","url_meta":{"origin":5216,"position":0},"title":"Reinventing the Real","author":"Tim","date":"16 June, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"\"You'll only find dirt, digging where other's have dug\"--Long John Silver, Treasure IslandPebbles by Jonathan Hunt, 2008. Made entirely in POV-RayThere is a definite use and function for digital photorealism, but it is almost exclusively the domain of the craftsman and not the artist. Artists don't get a thrill out\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":369,"url":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=369","url_meta":{"origin":5216,"position":1},"title":"It’s all about avoiding the insulting label "Eye Candy" isn’t it?","author":"Tim","date":"23 February, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"The Mona Lisa is famous for her \"mysterious smile\"; but is that enough to make it a great work of art?Isn't it just old-fashioned eye candy and in fact (I deal in facts), not much different than the portraits produced by the famous photographer, Yousuf Karsh -- and perhaps not\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":5637,"url":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=5637","url_meta":{"origin":5216,"position":2},"title":"The Art Dimension: turning fractals into art","author":"Tim","date":"7 July, 2016","format":false,"excerpt":"In my previous series of postings (first, second) on how to separate the art from the fractals, I basically say that the only way to do more with fractals than simply create computer crafts is to focus on producing works of abstract expressionism or landscape\/place.\u00a0 These are the only two\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/06\/84-A-Festive-3D-Encounter.jpeg?fit=500%2C281&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":419,"url":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=419","url_meta":{"origin":5216,"position":3},"title":"Meanwhile, back at the Academy…","author":"Tim","date":"8 October, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"lesson_2_atmosphere_isolation_for_janet Click to EnlargeI found this in the Student Galleries section of the Visual Arts Academy.\u00a0 There's no name or date but it's filed in the Ultra Fractal Artistry section of the gallery, a course given by Janet Parke.I like this.\u00a0 In fact, I fished it out of all the\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1829,"url":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=1829","url_meta":{"origin":5216,"position":4},"title":"Max Ernst: Fractal Art’s Imaginary Link","author":"Tim","date":"5 November, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Although the works of Max Ernst (1891-1976) might exhibit a pronounced frontal brow on their foreheads, closer examination reveals startling similarities between them and the contemporary fractal art that now inhabits the same landscapes they once did.","rel":"","context":"With 2 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 2 comments","link":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=1829#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/712px-Sahelanthropus_tchadensis_-_TM_266-01-060-1.jpg?fit=712%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/712px-Sahelanthropus_tchadensis_-_TM_266-01-060-1.jpg?fit=712%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/712px-Sahelanthropus_tchadensis_-_TM_266-01-060-1.jpg?fit=712%2C600&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/11\/712px-Sahelanthropus_tchadensis_-_TM_266-01-060-1.jpg?fit=712%2C600&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":2646,"url":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=2646","url_meta":{"origin":5216,"position":5},"title":"Reality Changes Things","author":"Tim","date":"11 April, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Something happens to fractals when they start to resemble real things.\u00a0 It's sad, in a way, but I think fractal art is limited in its appeal to a wider audience simply because it's \"fractal.\" Fractals have shape, color and pattern, but often those purely abstract, non-representational qualities relegate fractal imagery\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/04\/458px-Galaofspheres.jpg?fit=458%2C600&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5216","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5216"}],"version-history":[{"count":16,"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5216\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5266,"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5216\/revisions\/5266"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/5241"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5216"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5216"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5216"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}