{"id":411,"date":"2009-09-17T00:20:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-17T04:20:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=411"},"modified":"2009-09-17T00:20:00","modified_gmt":"2009-09-17T04:20:00","slug":"phase-two-a-real-fractal-art-exhibition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=411","title":{"rendered":"Phase Two: A Real Fractal Art Exhibition"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\"Swine<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Swine Flu<\/em> by Luke Jerram<\/a><\/p>\n

I think Tim’s recent observations that fractal art is about to undergo into a new Phase Two paradigm shift<\/a> are on target. Fractal art will never evolve beyond a curious, trippy, decorative craft until it moves away from being defined by software and instead starts thinking and acting like a legitimate form of expression within the broader parameters of the fine arts.<\/p>\n

The Benoit Mandelbrot Fractal Art Contest<\/a>, serious conflicts of interest<\/a> for half its organizers\/judges notwithstanding, is also a throwback example of old school, Phase One thinking. The competition is deliberately designed to suggest that “fractal art” can only come from software — and, in truth, almost exclusively from a particular software program favored<\/a>, sold, taught, and scripted by some of BMFAC’s directors\/judges. But this is only true if a narrow Phase One vision of what fractal art is and must be carries the day. After all, as Tim notes in a recent OT post<\/a>:<\/p>\n

\n

Fractal art is a fractal look and doesn’t have to be something rendered from computing a fractal algorithm.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

How true. If fractal art is art that has fractal characteristics like recursion and self-similarity, then the traditional mediums of the fine arts can be used for our genre just as easily as software. In fact, one could build the case that a true exhibition of fractal art would showcase art made using a variety of self-expressive tools — including painting, sculpture, ceramics, graphics design, and other recognized mediums. Software utilizing fractal algorithms to generate images would still be included, of course, but would merely be another component in the artistic arsenal, and such imagery might be broken into distinctions like algorithmic art or digital art, depending on the amount of graphic processing an individual artist used. But fractal art would be category of art, like abstract expressionism or cubism, and not winnowed down to be only the primarily Ultra Fractal images that will win this year’s BMFAC.<\/p>\n

In the spirit of Phase Two, here’s my idea of a real fractal art exhibition that includes the kind of work you won’t see displayed in next year’s Benoit Mandelbrot Fractal Art Contest show.<\/p>\n

\"E <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

E coli<\/em> (including detail) by Luke Jerram<\/a>. Medium: Sculpture\/Glass. <\/p>\n

Working with glass sculptors and virologists from the University of Bristol, Luke Jerram creates transparent glass sculptures of disease microorganisms. Microphotography<\/a> frequently reveals fractal characteristics in the microcosmic world, including crystals, bacteria, fungi, and (here) viruses. It’s hard, though, to imagine the HIV virus, however beautifully depicted, to be merely ornamental. And that’s exactly the kind of paradox Jerram wants to suggest. From his web site:<\/p>\n

\n

These transparent glass sculptures were created to contemplate the global impact of each disease and to consider how the artificial colouring of scientific imagery affects our understanding of phenomena. Jerram is exploring the tension between the artworks’ beauty and what they represent, their impact on humanity. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

It’s worth stressing again. Decoration isn’t enough. Meaning makes art.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Fractal Fish<\/em> by Kevin Gordon<\/a>. Medium: Glass. <\/p>\n

The glass-blown objects created by Kevin Gordon emphatically exhibit fractal attributes but are grounded in a fine arts tradition. From his website:<\/p>\n

\n

[Gordon] fuses layers of glass, with engravings and incised prisms and lenses to trap and transmit light and colour. The prisms are influenced by fractals and the \u2018Mandelbrot Theory\u2019 where the image is composed of smaller reflections of the whole. Gordon\u2019s preferred technique of engraved cameo glass, popular in nineteenth century France, is used by few glass artists in Australia because of its technical complexity and lengthy production time.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Isn’t Gordon’s work as worthy of being called fractal art as anything made in UF today and posted to the Fractalbook gallery of your choice?<\/p>\n

\"Technomorphic <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Technomorphic Fractal Dragon <\/em>by Art Videen<\/a>. Medium: Sculpture. <\/p>\n

Art Videen’s kinetic sculptures and “suspensions” explore the shadowy province found somewhere between chaos and order. The dragon’s scales in the piece above, including those seen in shadow, reveal intricate strata of self-similarity. Videen sees such fractal patterns as “loops” and notes on his web site that:<\/p>\n

\n

Another mechanical solution to an assembly issue, are the loops that are seen in much of his work. To Art, the loops immediately took on the meaning of dimensional bands in space and time. He saw the sculpture as objects suspended within the bands of space and, therefore, referred to the sculpture as \u201csuspensions.\u201d Others noticed the anthropomorphic shapes combined with the technical assemblage and referred to the sculpture as technomorphic . . . combining anthropomorphic and technical.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Doesn’t Videen deserve a corner installation at the next BMFAC? Too bad he’s using the wrong artistic format.<\/p>\n

\"Broccoli <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Broccoli by Natasha Harsh<\/a>. Medium: Oil Paint. <\/p>\n

If vegetables like broccoli and cauliflower display natural fractal forms, don’t they retain those forms when painted or sculpted? Natasha Harsh’s painting seems to reveal some common stalks and bubbles configurations I often saw when I first explored programs like Stephen C. Ferguson’s Tiera-Zon<\/a>. How unfortunate Harsh won’t be able to meet BMFAC’s entry specifications. If only she’d had the foresight to quit painting and instead import a photograph of broccoli into UF5 instead. Then, it seems, no one would question whether she was making fractal art.<\/p>\n

\"Comic<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

A comic book cover seen on Patterns of Visual Math<\/a>. Medium: Graphic Design\/Comic Art. <\/p>\n

While I’m not ready to argue this cover for a circa 1970’s Harvey comic constitutes fine art, it does show recursion. However, I am ready to go out on a limb and predict this illustration will contain more obvious fractal properties than some of October’s BMFAC winners and legion of runner-ups. <\/p>\n

\"Fractal<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Fractal Tea Cup. Sold on Teavana.com<\/a>. Medium: Ceramics. <\/p>\n

It seems the concept of what a fractal is might be more imprinted in mass culture than some of us have been led to believe. The Benoit Mandelbrot Fractal Art Contest claims one of its missions<\/a> is to select fractal art “that represents our art form to a world that largely does not know it — or if they do know it, they know only garish, 70s-style imagery.” If mass marketing has gotten a handle (no pun intended) on what fractals are and look like, can mission creep into the public mind be far behind? Is it just as possible that BMFAC wants to convince the world that its narrow definition of a UF layered and processed image is the only legitimate expression of our art form? And I wonder who exactly might benefit if such a meme started to stick in the collective consciousness?<\/p>\n

Such a far-reaching but constricted view of fractal art is only possible if our community continues to embrace a Phase One mindset, but emphasizing software over artistic context and content is dead end. Breaking into the fine arts is our only hope for being seen as bona fide<\/em> artists. Although your latest 1000+ decorative layers of UF epic technical achievement might wow some Fractalbook fanboys, it won’t matter in the long run if your image is still meaningless schlock that looks like a bad Yes bootleg cover. You’ll never be, as Dire Straits once sang, “In the Gallery.” A real gallery, that is. No, you’ll still be languishing in Phase One craft malls, and the shoppers strolling the flea market looking for trinkets won’t be able to tell the difference between your lovely, over-saturated spirals and the pretty, painted rocks in the next booth.<\/p>\n

~\/~<\/p>\n

Tags:<\/strong> fractal<\/a>, fractals<\/a>, fractal art<\/a>, fractal blog<\/a>, fractal art phase two<\/a>, fine art<\/a>, benoit mandelbrot fractal art contest<\/a>, phase two a real fractal art exhibition<\/a>, ultra fractal<\/a>, phase one your booth is next to the guy selling driftwood<\/a>, cruelanimal<\/a>, orbit trap<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Swine Flu by Luke Jerram I think Tim’s recent observations that fractal art is about to undergo into a new Phase Two paradigm shift are on target. Fractal art will never evolve beyond a curious, trippy, decorative craft until it moves away from being defined by software and instead starts thinking and acting like a … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3193,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-411","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/09\/JackieJokers_recursion.jpg?fit=337%2C500","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":406,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=406","url_meta":{"origin":411,"position":0},"title":"Fractal Art, Phase Two","author":"Tim","date":"3 September, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"What? You didn't know even know there was a Phase One? Well, let me begin there, then. At the dawn of fractal art.Phase One, the first stage of fractal art, has been oriented around software. The big developments in fractal art came from developments in the software that made it.\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=406#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/ambaka.com\/blog\/25\/phase2.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2781,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=2781","url_meta":{"origin":411,"position":1},"title":"Is the 2011 BMFAC Accepting Entries from All Artistic Mediums?","author":"cruelanimal","date":"18 July, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Was this object made with fractal hardware? Y by Mark Wallinger. Photograph seen here. Fractal art is a fractal look and doesn\u2019t have to be something rendered from computing a fractal algorithm. --Tim Hodkinson, Orbit Trap Two remarks have caught my attention this week. The first was baffling but exhilarating.\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 4 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 4 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=2781#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"BMFAC Judging Panel","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/BMFACJudgingPanel.jpg?fit=450%2C298&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5462,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=5462","url_meta":{"origin":411,"position":2},"title":"Maybe You Should Stop Calling Yourself a “Fractal Artist”","author":"cruelanimal","date":"17 August, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Oxford Tire Pile 9b by Edward Burtynsky [Click on images to see higher resolution renditions.] \u00a0 Shut up and play your guitar. --Frank Zappa Seriously. I mean it. Calling yourself a \"fractal artist\" could be damaging your fine artistic street cred. On the Wikipedia Fractal entry, as Tim revealed in\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/EdwardBurtynsky_OxfordTirePile9b_sm.jpg?fit=450%2C364&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":2249,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=2249","url_meta":{"origin":411,"position":3},"title":"More Phase Two Sightings","author":"cruelanimal","date":"16 January, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"sbioelements (from Undersea) by Tatiana Plokhova I figured it might be time to return again to examining work that falls into the category of Phase Two fractal art.\u00a0 Tim laid down the foundation for Phase Two thinking in an earlier OT post where he notes that Phase Two fractal art\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"White by Tatiana Plokhova","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/01\/white_TatianaPlokhova.jpg?fit=425%2C444&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1053,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=1053","url_meta":{"origin":411,"position":4},"title":"Return to Phase Two","author":"cruelanimal","date":"4 April, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Detail of Tuna by Chris Jordan I thought it might be fitting to once again examine pushing fractal art into its second phase.\u00a0 Tim laid the initial groundwork for a Phase Two approach to our discipline, and I've presented several examples of what a Phase Two fractal art exhibition might\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"Tuna (Detail) by Chris Jordan","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/04\/ChrisJordan_Running7.jpg?fit=400%2C267&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":3613,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=3613","url_meta":{"origin":411,"position":5},"title":"Phase Two: Byte 1","author":"cruelanimal","date":"12 December, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Fractal Alchemy (Detail) by Carl Scrase Now that the decorative dust has settled from the most recent (and oftentimes lamest) iteration of the Benoit Mandelbrot Fractal Art Contest (BMFAC), I figure it's time again to revisit the notion that the competition (and fractal art in general) ought to think outside\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/12\/GustavKlimt_PepperSprayingCop_sm1.jpg?fit=450%2C338&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/411","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=411"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/411\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=411"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=411"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=411"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}