{"id":379,"date":"2009-04-06T13:42:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-06T17:42:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=379"},"modified":"2009-04-06T13:42:00","modified_gmt":"2009-04-06T17:42:00","slug":"more-thoughts-on-good-and-bad-fractal-art","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=379","title":{"rendered":"More Thoughts on Good and Bad Fractal Art"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"center\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/i3.photobucket.com\/albums\/y95\/armyyouhave\/cruelanimal\/good-art-is-killing-me.jpg?w=545\" alt=\"And I've commented until I'm just skin and bones...\" \/><\/p>\n<div>  <\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>Too much &#8220;good&#8221; fractal art is killing me. <\/em><\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: center;\">  <\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">[Photogragraph seen on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.silive.com\/news\/index.ssf\/2008\/10\/26-week\/\" target=\"_blank\">silive.com<\/a>.] <\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">I liked <a href=\"http:\/\/orbittrap.blogspot.com\/2009\/04\/can-bad-fractals-be-good-art.html\" target=\"_blank\">Tim&#8217;s last post<\/a>. I think he&#8217;s right. And I figured why not carry on this conversation a bit more.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe so-called good fractals truly are bad because they&#8217;re made for the wrong reason.  In a way, fractal art got off to a &#8220;bad&#8221; start.  Fractal images were first shared on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.toothpastefordinner.com\/010604\/1992-on-usenet.gif\" target=\"_blank\">Usenet<\/a> with its threaded comment structure.  Consequently, fractal art (unlike, say, digital photography) initially only had one primary outlet for mass distribution.  So images were posted with <a href=\"http:\/\/farm4.static.flickr.com\/3435\/3289059765_cd36d04e24.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">comment threads<\/a> in mind.  This led to institutionalizing the following criteria: <em>The longer the comment thread, the better the image<\/em>.  So, almost by design, fractal art became about making art to please others more than creating art to please yourself.  Vision isn&#8217;t what you see but how you see others seeing you. This model still holds sway and is embraced by Fractalbook today &#8212; only with many more bells and whistles.<\/p>\n<p>Worse, certain fractal artists cooked up contests that skirted ethics and deliberately rewarded their own work and that of their friends. What then happened? Their aesthetics eventually became the rubric for &#8220;good&#8221; fractal art &#8212; first with the Spiral Swirlies School (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fractalforum.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Fractal Universe Calendar<\/a>), then with the layered fractal pancakes that privilege more recent versions of Ultra Fractal (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.fractalartcontests.com\/2007\/\" target=\"_blank\">Benoit Mandelbrot Fractal Art Contest<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p>But truly good art rarely wins the <a href=\"http:\/\/goldderby.latimes.com\/awards_goldderby\/images\/2008\/11\/11\/britney_spears_peoples_choice_award.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">People&#8217;s Choice Awards<\/a> &#8212; that is, generates the longest, gushing comment thread at <a href=\"http:\/\/www.deviantart.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">deviantART<\/a> or <a href=\"http:\/\/www.renderosity.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Renderosity<\/a>, serves as a FUC headstone\/eyecandy for a month, or wins that &#8220;big&#8221; contest like BMFAC.  In fact, truly good art is often deemed ugly.  Such a designation, of course, labels such art as bad, at least in the conventional wisdom and in the eyes of the undiscerning.  So, it&#8217;s shunned.  After all, to acknowledge it, even as strange or different, would call the established order into question.<\/p>\n<p>But isn&#8217;t that what good art is supposed to do?<\/p>\n<p>I guess I feel that <a href=\"http:\/\/www.fantastic-fractals.com\/image-files\/swan_fractal_flame_s1.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">fractal swans<\/a> aren&#8217;t choked because they are either over- or under-processed.  They&#8217;re choked while still <a href=\"http:\/\/www.psiloswildlifephotography.co.uk\/features\/cygnets2.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">cygnets<\/a> by slavishly adhering to the BMFAC\/FUC rules, aesthetics, and codes of artistic conduct.  UF propagates the status quo, even makes replication of the prevailing \u201cgood\u201d model easy, since only a few of the fractal programming wizards write the cardinal codes.  The UF serfs gobble up the UF List crumbs, then fire up their photocopy machines.  But, like copies, each successive tweaked dupe loses something and adds to an ongoing <a href=\"http:\/\/www.potatoland.org\/landfill\/\" target=\"_blank\">digital landfill<\/a> glut.  But what&#8217;s more important?  Making stunning, relevant art?  Or keeping the pecking order in check?  Everyone knows the drill. <a href=\"ttp:\/\/visual-arts-academy.com\/courses.html\" target=\"_blank\">Emulate<\/a> the (self-proclaimed) &#8220;most important fractal artists in the world&#8221; and they&#8217;ll probably put their hands on you and let you into the temple.  Just as long as you understand you&#8217;ll always be a <a href=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/en\/1\/13\/Kung_Fu-From_Dark_Angel.png\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;grasshopper&#8221;<\/a> that must never dare to question or challenge the masters.<\/p>\n<p>And, as experience shows, if you don&#8217;t deliberately imitate your &#8220;betters,\u201d the result is a foregone conclusion. You wind up a perpetual <a href=\"http:\/\/www.brandidentityguru.com\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/07\/loser21.jpg\" target=\"_blank\">\u201closer.\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n<p>How to break the cycle? Easy. Make the art that pleases you rather than the art you think other \u201cgood\u201d artists want to see.<span style=\"font-weight: bold;\"><\/p>\n<p>Tags:<\/span> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/fractal\">fractal<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/fractals\">fractals<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/fractal+art\">fractal art<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/fractal+blog\">fractal blog<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/benoit+mandelbrot+fractal+art+contest\">benoit mandelbrot fractal art contest<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/fractal%20universe%20calendar\">fractal universe calendar<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/mississippi+school+of+anti-fractal+art\">mississippi school of anti-fractal art<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/choking+the+swan\">choking the swan<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/cruelanimal\">cruelanimal <\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.technorati.com\/tag\/orbit+trap\">orbit trap<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Too much &#8220;good&#8221; fractal art is killing me. [Photogragraph seen on silive.com.] I liked Tim&#8217;s last post. I think he&#8217;s right. And I figured why not carry on this conversation a bit more. Maybe so-called good fractals truly are bad because they&#8217;re made for the wrong reason. In a way, fractal art got off to &hellip; <a href=\"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=379\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3206,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-379","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/04\/good-art-is-killing-me.jpg?fit=450%2C301","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":406,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=406","url_meta":{"origin":379,"position":0},"title":"Fractal Art, Phase Two","author":"Tim","date":"3 September, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"What? You didn't know even know there was a Phase One? Well, let me begin there, then. At the dawn of fractal art.Phase One, the first stage of fractal art, has been oriented around software. The big developments in fractal art came from developments in the software that made it.\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=406#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/ambaka.com\/blog\/25\/phase2.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5075,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=5075","url_meta":{"origin":379,"position":1},"title":"The Synthetic Aesthetic &#8211; Part 1","author":"Tim","date":"22 August, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"This is another one of those theoretical postings; you might want to skip it and go look at some fresh fractal art instead.\u00a0 But if you're still interested, in this posting I intend to examine what fractal art has come to be and show that this evolution of the art\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/08\/jhl16.png?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":411,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=411","url_meta":{"origin":379,"position":2},"title":"Phase Two: A Real Fractal Art Exhibition","author":"cruelanimal","date":"17 September, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Swine Flu by Luke Jerram I think Tim's recent observations that fractal art is about to undergo into a new Phase Two paradigm shift are on target. Fractal art will never evolve beyond a curious, trippy, decorative craft until it moves away from being defined by software and instead starts\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 2 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 2 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=411#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/09\/JackieJokers_recursion.jpg?fit=337%2C500&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":337,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=337","url_meta":{"origin":379,"position":3},"title":"My Art is Red Hot, You&#8217;re Art Ain&#8217;t Diddley-Squat!","author":"Tim","date":"8 August, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Bloody SunsetIn the year, 2008, Fractal Art is boring.It wasn't always like that. There was a time when Fractal Art was exciting. But that was just because it was new.Now the excitement is found only in a few enclaves high in the mountains; hard to reach, remote, inaccessible places. From\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=337#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":202,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=202","url_meta":{"origin":379,"position":4},"title":"Has Ultra Fractal become the Walmart of fractal art?","author":"Tim","date":"4 July, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"\"So radically innovative are Ultra Fractal's capabilities that they have literally redefined fractal art since the program's debut.\"(From Ultrafractal.com)It's complicated. Believe me, it took me a few years to come to such a radical and harsh conclusion. I mean, what could be bad about a program that has been used\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 16 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 16 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=202#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":349,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=349","url_meta":{"origin":379,"position":5},"title":"Fractal Web Rings Are For Suckers!","author":"Tim","date":"20 October, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"(photo by Kyle Flood)Yes, the internet has changed quite a bit over the years and the only purpose those web rings serve anymore is to drain away visitors from your site and pour them into the web ring. Joining a web ring and putting their link banner on your site\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 2 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 2 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=349#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=379"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/379\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3206"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}