{"id":369,"date":"2009-02-23T18:40:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-23T22:40:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=369"},"modified":"2009-02-23T18:40:00","modified_gmt":"2009-02-23T22:40:00","slug":"its-all-about-avoiding-the-insulting-label-eye-candy-isnt-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=369","title":{"rendered":"It’s all about avoiding the insulting label "Eye Candy" isn’t it?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Mona Lisa is famous for her “mysterious smile”; but is that enough to make it a great work of art?
<\/center>
Isn’t it just old-fashioned eye candy and in fact (I deal in facts), not much different than the portraits produced by the famous photographer, Yousuf Karsh<\/a> — and perhaps not even as good as that?<\/i><\/p>\n

I find the formal art world to be a breeding ground for fads and self-promoting theories which inhibit artistic creativity because they don’t reflect what art really is and subsequently present a confused perspective to art viewers and new artists corrupting their minds by convincing them that they can’t think for themselves and need to be educated by the experts in order to make sense of art itself, which is essentially a personal experience and needs no explanation any more than a cup of cold water on a hot day needs a set of instructions.<\/p>\n

For those of you readers who’ve been following this sequence of posts on Orbit Trap, you will be aware that me and my co-blogger, Terry Wright appear to have some different views about Fractal Art and what makes it “art” or not.\u00a0 He’s mellowed a bit in his last response, but I find there’s still something about his perspective on fractal art that bothers me.\u00a0 I’m also not quite sure what that “something” is, but here’s my latest input into the discussion.<\/p>\n

Terry wrote…<\/p>\n

This or that has got to go. We need to start thinking of our art form as more of a straight line, doubled-sided arrow — sort of like the “Threat Assessment Chart”<\/a> Rolling Stone<\/em> currently uses. On the left end of the arrow is the word FRACTAL, and on the right end is the word ART. All of us fall someone on this arrow — some resting closer to FRACTAL and others resting nearer to ART. Fractal art, then, can never be this or that. Instead, it’s a wonderfully complex and richly varied continuum. All each of us does is decide on what point of the arrow we want to set up our own house.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I like the bit about getting rid of the “this or that” restrictive definitions and the part about everything being wonderful, rich and varied, but I take exception to the continuum thing with just plain “FRACTAL” at one end of the scale (bottom end, I’ll bet) and the old, holy, shining, “land of Plato’s perfect forms” ART at the other end of the scale.<\/p>\n

But I’ve misunderstood what you’ve said before, so maybe I’m oversimplifying or distorting this double-arrow concept, too.\u00a0 What I have a problem with, I guess, is the that “ART” thing.\u00a0 I think that’s the disease we need to rid the fractal art world of — next<\/i>.<\/p>\n

I would say… Art is subjective, a personal experience, easily influenced by social forces, highly contextualized, can’t be trusted and ought to wear an ankle bracelet with a GPS tracker so we can all start running when it enters the room or approaches our neighbourhood.<\/i><\/p>\n

Art is a moving target, hard to hit and even then it only stumbles a bit and continues on it’s way perennially avoiding capture and captivity.\u00a0 Those who define art in absolute terms have only grasped art for a brief moment and pulled off part of it’s tail or a patch of fur and then mistaken it for the entire creature that is still at large.\u00a0 Art is a shadow, placed under bright lights and thoroughly examined by a committee.<\/p>\n

Rather than being some all-inclusive, double-ended arrow heading in the two directions “fractal” and “art”, I would say that fractal art\u00a0 is a total wilderness with a dozen or so people pursuing creative interests that have nothing in common except for the use of fractal imagery which is about as meaningful as saying that both Picasso and Thomas Kincaide are artist’s.<\/p>\n

Some fractal artists are more akin to flower arrangers and many others have more in common with Photoshop digital artists whose work is heavily transformed and though it may be appealing in other ways, has little fractal appeal.<\/p>\n

Does some fractal art have more art to it than others?\u00a0 I would say that the so-called higher forms of art (“arty” art) are actually just different forms of art and not categorically higher.\u00a0 Picasso’s Guernica<\/a> tells a story, expresses intense emotions, gives insight into human tragedy, and does it all in a very primitive, appealing and creative graphical style.\u00a0 Guernica is one of the best examples of high-class, masterpiece art.\u00a0 But who wants that hanging in the living room to meditate or reflect upon?\u00a0 It’s a graphic depiction of a vicious bombing raid on innocent civilians!<\/p>\n

We ought to evaluate fractal art and all forms of art just as we would a set of household tools.\u00a0 Some art does one thing and other art does something else.\u00a0 Screwdriver art is not as forceful as hammer art, but can be much more intense and do more sophisticated things with greater detail.\u00a0 Chainsaw art is very appealing when one is outdoors, but inside the house it’s harsh and almost obnoxious.\u00a0 Most people like to look at circular saw art or admire a piece of mitre saw art when in a more refined environment.\u00a0 This is much more than I think Terry is suggesting.\u00a0 I’m saying that a chainsaw and a screwdriver can be compared to each other, but that it makes no sense to measure their strengths by the same standards because they are unrelated to each other except for occupying the same general category of “tool”.<\/p>\n

I would say, in my opinion (and art is the domain of opinion — personal and collective) the highest, most excellent works of art are all from the surrealist category of art.\u00a0 Surrealist art<\/a> is the highest, most worthy form of art.\u00a0 It also cuts across almost all styles, media and schools of art.\u00a0 Almost any kind of art can be surreal because surrealism is an experience that the mind of the viewer has.\u00a0 We all make better art when it has stronger surrealist qualities.\u00a0 It is always my goal and the direction of my effort to create surreal images.\u00a0 <\/p>\n

That’s why I like algorithmic or machine-made imagery the most; it’s better at creating odd and startling imagery than the human mind is.\u00a0 So in that case, more ‘fractal” means more “art”!<\/p>\n

Yes.\u00a0 I think I’ve won the thread!\u00a0 But there’s no shame coming in second to a Champion like me.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Mona Lisa is famous for her “mysterious smile”; but is that enough to make it a great work of art?Isn’t it just old-fashioned eye candy and in fact (I deal in facts), not much different than the portraits produced by the famous photographer, Yousuf Karsh — and perhaps not even as good as that? … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":407,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=407","url_meta":{"origin":369,"position":0},"title":"I’m sick of Eye Candy","author":"Tim","date":"8 September, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Even my own homemade recipes leave me with an unsettled stomach.\u00a0 I used to get a thrill out of making some colorful lollipop of an image, but that stuff is for kids.\u00a0 If you still crave candy, then you're still a kid too.Call it Decorative Art, or The Decorative Arts,\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=407#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":214,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=214","url_meta":{"origin":369,"position":1},"title":"Who Dissected Roger Rabbit","author":"cruelanimal","date":"5 August, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Who Dissected Roger Rabbit (2007) The function of art is to disturb. Science reassures.--Georges Braque Andrea Yates believed that cartoon characters told her she was a bad mother who fed her children too much candy...--Court TV News For some reason, disembowelment and bloodshed is a helluva lot funnier when it's\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=214#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"Who Dissected Roger Rabbit (Detail)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/08\/rogerrabbit_detail_ulc.jpg?fit=450%2C312&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":370,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=370","url_meta":{"origin":369,"position":2},"title":"Challenges for Fractal Artists","author":"Tim","date":"24 February, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Under Red Sea, by maruscyaI think working with fractals is very much like the art of nature photography.\u00a0 Nature photography tends to be descriptive, showing what things look like and focusing primarily on the form, color and interesting situations that one finds in the natural world.\u00a0 Sometimes you see a\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=370#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":341,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=341","url_meta":{"origin":369,"position":3},"title":"Does Jos Leys Have Super-Powers?","author":"Tim","date":"28 August, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"It was a dark and stormy night. Inside the castle, the notorious Dr. Leys was busy working away in his laboratory. Either by serendipitous discovery, maniacal experimentation, or exhaustion brought on by long bouts of feverish fractal rendering -- an Ultra Fractal parameter file fell into the POV-Ray Raytracing program\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","block_context":{"text":"With 1 comment","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=341#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":2836,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=2836","url_meta":{"origin":369,"position":4},"title":"Rebooting Fractal Art: Part 1","author":"Tim","date":"29 July, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"What is Fractal Art Missing? I look at da Vinci's Mona Lisa and I see something.\u00a0 I look at just about any piece of fractal art and I don't see that thing.\u00a0 What's fractal art missing?\u00a0 Why does it always seem to be missing something that other art forms seem\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 6 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 6 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=2836#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/250px-Mona_Lisa_by_Leonardo_da_Vinci_from_C2RMF_retouched.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1390,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=1390","url_meta":{"origin":369,"position":5},"title":"FUC Redux","author":"cruelanimal","date":"5 July, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"I've been reiterated from the undead. [Image seen on Amazon.com.] The Fractal Universe Calendar (FUC) returns with a makeover. Previously put out by Avalanche Publishing, it is now under the aegis of Mosely Road Publishers which describes it as full of the most visually arresting fractals. Let's see if you\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 3 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 3 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=1390#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"FUC 2011","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/07\/fuc2011.jpg?fit=450%2C450&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=369"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/369\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}