{"id":1204,"date":"2010-05-18T16:45:59","date_gmt":"2010-05-18T20:45:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=1204"},"modified":"2010-05-20T13:08:08","modified_gmt":"2010-05-20T17:08:08","slug":"privately-owned-algorithms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=1204","title":{"rendered":"Privately Owned Algorithms?"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

\"Mine<\/p>\n

It’s mine!!\u00a0 All mine!!<\/em><\/p>\n

[Image seen on nikadon.com<\/a>.]<\/p>\n

Can one patent abstract ideas?\u00a0 Or claim equations as intellectual property?<\/p>\n

The U.S. Supreme Court<\/a> will likely make a decision in the near future concerning the constitutional scope of patents.\u00a0 The decision could have profound implications pertaining to the legality of free software — and possibly have ramifications for fractal software, fractal programmers, and fractal artists.<\/p>\n

David Bollier, writing in OntheCommons.org<\/a>, lays out the dimensions of the court case:<\/p>\n

At the heart of the case known as Bilski v. Kappos<\/a><\/em> is a \u201cbusiness method patent\u201d application that sought to obtain a patent for a method of managing the risk of bad weather through commodities trading. Bilski did not build any invention or device, as traditional patents have required; he came up with a method of doing business that orchestrates human knowledge and interactions, for which he believes he deserves a patent.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

But this is the passage (and question) that caught my eye and caused me to reflect on possible ripple effects<\/a> in the fractal art community:<\/p>\n

But should the government be in the business of granting legally protecting monopolies on abstract ideas such as \u201cbusiness methods\u201d and mathematical algorithms? The outcome of the case is being watched closely by the free software community because it could negatively affect the future of collaboratively developed code.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Can algorithms be privately owned?\u00a0 Maybe — at least that is what some legal precedents seem to suggest.\u00a0 Bollier clarifies:<\/p>\n

Patents are given out so freely by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office that companies have the legal rights to all sorts of abstract ideas, some of which may be embedded in software. \u201cOne-click shopping\u201d was one of the earliest, most infamous business method patents granted. \u201cIf you\u2019re selling online, at the most recent count there are 4,319 patents you could be violating,\u201d said David E. Martin, chief executive of M-Cam Inc., an Arlington, Va.-based risk-management firm specializing in patents.<\/p>\n

A key issue in the Bilski<\/em> case is the appropriateness of granting patents for software and other sorts of collaboratively produced Internet works. It once made sense to grant patent monopolies over inventions developed by individuals or companies, but now that the Internet makes online collaboration so powerful and efficient, should anyone be allowed to privatize collectively generated knowledge and then charge premiums for it?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I predict a massive mess in Fractaldom if the court ruling codifies algorithms as deserving of patentability.\u00a0 Imagine the chaos<\/a> (no pun intended) if Ultra Fractal<\/a>‘s poobah-programmers decided to patent their formulas, or even parts of them.\u00a0 UF, which relies heavily on user-based formulas and openly encourages tweaking, not to mention its ability to combine lots of soon-to-be patentable private property<\/a> into layers, might become nearly unusable since any image made with UF could be stuffed with patent violations.<\/p>\n

In fact, in a worse case scenario, the creative forces behind Ultra Fractal, who did a bit of liberal borrowing when initially creating the program, might find themselves facing some retroactive monetary compensation to some of these folks:<\/p>\n

\"One<\/p>\n

We gave freely of ourselves so that UF’s author and select courtesans could prosper. <\/em><\/p>\n

[Image seen on AliceKelley.com<\/a>.]<\/p>\n

Currently, “pure knowledge” like algorithms is not patentable. However, if the high court rules in favor of more stringent patent restrictions, the result could be especially devastating for open source<\/a> programming.\u00a0 Would innovation still occur when some aggregated components suddenly become patented?<\/p>\n

And, artists, what about all of “your” images made with free fractal software?\u00a0 If the author of such software can soon own many of the formulas you used, will you have to pay a kind of licensing fee to display those images — or else be forced to remove them from any public sphere?<\/p>\n

For whatever it’s worth, according to court reporters, the SCOTUS justices generally did not warm to the idea of broadening the scope of patents.\u00a0 According to The Prior Art<\/a>:<\/p>\n

Across the board, the justices indicated a deep skepticism toward the invention described in the patent application at issue.<\/p>\n

[…]<\/p>\n

Some of the justices went even further — expressing both a fair amount of disdain for the idea of granting broad “method” patents and a concern that ruling in favor of the petitioners would lead to patent grants on fundamental ways of conducting business or organizing human behavior.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Still, even if the U.S. high court rules against such an amplified view of patents, courts elsewhere in the world might begin to weigh in on such matters.<\/p>\n

I sense this case could have far-flung knottiness<\/a> for most of us, but I admit my own shortcomings here.\u00a0 I am not an attorney, nor am I well versed in legal matters.\u00a0 Subsequently, I’d welcome hearing from any of OT’s readers who might be able to shed more light on what is and is not at stake here.<\/p>\n

~\/~<\/p>\n

If you’re interested, you can view an admittedly subjective thirty-minute video discussing the origins of software patents and their detrimental effects.\u00a0 It is entitled Patently Absurd: How Software Patents Broke the System<\/em><\/a>.\u00a0 It was made by filmmaker Luca Lucarini<\/a> and financed by the Free Software Foundation<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Tags:<\/strong> fractal<\/a>, fractals<\/a>, fractal art<\/a>, fractal blog<\/a>, digital art<\/a>, bilski vs kappos<\/a>, privately owned algorithms<\/a>, patent law<\/a>, all your par files are ours<\/a>, cruelanimal<\/a>, orbit trap<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

It’s mine!!\u00a0 All mine!! [Image seen on nikadon.com.] Can one patent abstract ideas?\u00a0 Or claim equations as intellectual property? The U.S. Supreme Court will likely make a decision in the near future concerning the constitutional scope of patents.\u00a0 The decision could have profound implications pertaining to the legality of free software — and possibly have … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3175,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1204","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/05\/MineAllMine.jpg?fit=500%2C355","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":2781,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=2781","url_meta":{"origin":1204,"position":0},"title":"Is the 2011 BMFAC Accepting Entries from All Artistic Mediums?","author":"cruelanimal","date":"18 July, 2011","format":false,"excerpt":"Was this object made with fractal hardware? Y by Mark Wallinger. Photograph seen here. Fractal art is a fractal look and doesn\u2019t have to be something rendered from computing a fractal algorithm. --Tim Hodkinson, Orbit Trap Two remarks have caught my attention this week. The first was baffling but exhilarating.\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 4 comments","block_context":{"text":"With 4 comments","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=2781#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"BMFAC Judging Panel","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/07\/BMFACJudgingPanel.jpg?fit=450%2C298&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":409,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=409","url_meta":{"origin":1204,"position":1},"title":"Fractal Art Without a Computer?","author":"Tim","date":"11 September, 2009","format":false,"excerpt":"Could this work be described as ...Fractal?Admiral Otto Von Howitzerhead by Kris Kuksi 2009Samuel Monnier, writing at Algorithmic Worlds, his new website - gallery - and blog, said some very interesting things about the fractal nature of sculptures done by Kris Kuksi.\u00a0 Sam said that Kris Kuksi's scuptures \"are very\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":198,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=198","url_meta":{"origin":1204,"position":2},"title":"A Dream of Post Post-Processing","author":"cruelanimal","date":"26 June, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Yes. I'm returning to rant again on my favorite pet peeve: the never-say-die stink surrounding post-processing. I know some of you feel this is a dead issue. We all get along now... ...except we don't. The old biases just keep cropping up.From \"Recent Evolution in Fractal Art\" from Ken Keller's\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","block_context":{"text":"With 1 comment","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=198#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"The Last Bee (Detail)","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2007\/06\/lastbee_detail_lrc.jpg?fit=450%2C286&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":1673,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=1673","url_meta":{"origin":1204,"position":3},"title":"FUC: The Unholy Trinity — or, Are Our Ears Burning Again?","author":"cruelanimal","date":"27 September, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"If you're a critic on the Internet, everyone can hear you scream. --Cameron Woodhead, The Sydney Morning Herald Image seen on blog.hr. It should go without saying that when folks speak out about OT in online public forums, I can hear them.\u00a0 Sometimes, I like to return the favor of\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","block_context":{"text":"With 1 comment","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=1673#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"Mine All Mine!","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2010\/09\/mineallmine2.jpg?fit=396%2C612&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5109,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=5109","url_meta":{"origin":1204,"position":4},"title":"The Synthetic Aesthetic 3: Ultrashop and Photo Fractal","author":"Tim","date":"3 September, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"This is the third part of a series on The Synthetic Aesthetic: artwork which is mechanically made as opposed to handmade ( Part 1 \/ Part 2 ).\u00a0 Fractal art borders on this synthetic realm because it is one of the most powerful tools for the computational generation of imagery.\u2026","rel":"","context":"With 1 comment","block_context":{"text":"With 1 comment","link":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=5109#comments"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/09\/20061012-vor10-by-Samuel-Monnier.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":5462,"url":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/?p=5462","url_meta":{"origin":1204,"position":5},"title":"Maybe You Should Stop Calling Yourself a “Fractal Artist”","author":"cruelanimal","date":"17 August, 2014","format":false,"excerpt":"Oxford Tire Pile 9b by Edward Burtynsky [Click on images to see higher resolution renditions.] \u00a0 Shut up and play your guitar. --Frank Zappa Seriously. I mean it. Calling yourself a \"fractal artist\" could be damaging your fine artistic street cred. On the Wikipedia Fractal entry, as Tim revealed in\u2026","rel":"","context":"Similar post","block_context":{"text":"Similar post","link":""},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/orbittrap.ca\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/08\/EdwardBurtynsky_OxfordTirePile9b_sm.jpg?fit=450%2C364&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1204","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1204"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1204\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1208,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1204\/revisions\/1208"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/3175"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1204"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1204"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/orbittrap.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1204"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}